"All the arguments to prove man's superiority cannot shatter this hard fact: in suffering the animals are our equals"
About this Quote
Singer lands this like a gavel: not with a tender plea for kindness, but with a cold demotion of the human ego. The line is engineered to bypass the usual escape hatches - intelligence, language, culture, soul - and drag the debate to a single, stubborn datum: whatever else we think we are, we are not alone in the capacity to hurt. By calling it a "hard fact", he frames suffering as empirically undeniable rather than spiritually negotiable, the kind of reality you can only evade through willful blindness.
The subtext is a direct indictment of the ways societies launder cruelty through philosophy. "All the arguments" is doing a lot of work: it gestures toward centuries of rationalizations (from Aristotle to Descartes to everyday meat-eater common sense) that treat animals as instruments because humans can write treatises about it. Singer flips the hierarchy by choosing a metric that doesn't flatter the species doing the measuring. Superiority becomes irrelevant, even embarrassing, when the moral question is about what can be harmed, not what can compose symphonies.
Context matters: Singer is a leading voice in modern utilitarian ethics and the animal liberation movement, pushing against speciesism the way earlier reformers pushed against racism or sexism - not by claiming animals are "like us" in every way, but by insisting that likeness isn't the point. The rhetorical move is strategic: if suffering is the moral baseline, then factory farming, animal testing, and casual consumption stop looking like private choices and start looking like systemic violence with excellent PR.
The subtext is a direct indictment of the ways societies launder cruelty through philosophy. "All the arguments" is doing a lot of work: it gestures toward centuries of rationalizations (from Aristotle to Descartes to everyday meat-eater common sense) that treat animals as instruments because humans can write treatises about it. Singer flips the hierarchy by choosing a metric that doesn't flatter the species doing the measuring. Superiority becomes irrelevant, even embarrassing, when the moral question is about what can be harmed, not what can compose symphonies.
Context matters: Singer is a leading voice in modern utilitarian ethics and the animal liberation movement, pushing against speciesism the way earlier reformers pushed against racism or sexism - not by claiming animals are "like us" in every way, but by insisting that likeness isn't the point. The rhetorical move is strategic: if suffering is the moral baseline, then factory farming, animal testing, and casual consumption stop looking like private choices and start looking like systemic violence with excellent PR.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Peter Singer, Animal Liberation (1975). |
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List








