"And gradually they're beginning to recognize the fact that there's nothing more secure than a democratic, accountable, and participatory form of government. But it's sunk in only theoretically, it has not yet sunk in completely in practical terms"

Wole Soyinka’s words highlight a critical observation about the evolution of political consciousness and governance in societies that have undergone or are still experiencing authoritarian rule. The passage reflects a growing recognition, likely among both leaders and citizens, that democratic systems, characterized by accountability, transparency, and participation, offer the strongest foundation for lasting security and stability. This realization is described as gradual, indicating that it is not the product of a sudden epiphany, but rather a slow, cumulative change in mindset that emerges in response to political events, social movements, and perhaps the failures of less open systems.

However, Soyinka draws a line between intellectual acknowledgment and actual implementation. The understanding of democracy’s value has "sunk in only theoretically", meaning that while people may give rhetorical support to democratic principles, they have not yet adopted them fully into their practical, day-to-day operations of government or civic life. There is an implicit distinction between paying lip service to ideals, publicly asserting the virtues of democracy, and embedding those ideals into the structures, behaviors, and traditions of governance. Institutions may appear to embrace democratic forms, elections, constitutions, legislative bodies, but without the genuine practice of accountability and participation, these forms can remain hollow.

The commentary suggests a kind of tension or disconnect: societies might be outwardly reforming, drafting new laws, or promoting pluralism, but deep-rooted habits, interests, or fears can stall the genuine empowerment of citizens and the establishment of checks and balances on power. For Soyinka, the challenge lies in converting theoretical commitment into lived reality, making sure that democratic systems are not just nominally in place but are actively protecting rights, ensuring accountability, and encouraging broad participation. The observation is especially resonant in contexts emerging from autocracy, where previous distrust and disengagement can persist even as new norms are discussed or legislated. Ultimately, it is a call for vigilance, persistence, and integrity in the journey from aspiration to tangible practice in building democratic societies.