"And now when we hear that Iran and Iraq plan to cooperate more closely and that a fundamentalist is coming to power in Tehran - a man about whom we cannot be sure that he is absolutely averse to terrorism - it is very worrisome"

Otto Schily's quote reflects a deep issue about geopolitical shifts involving Iran and Iraq, along with the potential rise of a fundamentalist leader in Tehran. To analyze this quote, it's important to analyze the historical and political context surrounding these declarations.

Schily's mention of Iran and Iraq's intention to "comply more carefully" most likely referrals a duration when the 2 nations, traditionally understood for their adversarial relationship, were looking to enhance bilateral ties. This modification could be seen with apprehension by other countries, specifically Western powers, due to the strategic ramifications in a region already laden with tension and conflict.

The concentrate on a "fundamentalist" coming to power in Tehran highlights issues about the ideological trajectory of the Iranian federal government. Fundamentalism, in this context, recommends a return to stringent spiritual interpretations that may influence governance and diplomacy, potentially exacerbating existing stress. Schily clearly raises the alarm that this individual may not be "definitely averse to terrorism". This phrase highlights worries about the capacity for state-supported terrorism or the tolerance of extremist groups, which might destabilize the area additional and present risks beyond its borders.

Schily's concern is most likely magnified by the uncertainties surrounding the intents and policies of this new leadership. His usage of expressions like "we can not make certain" and "it is extremely uneasy" interacts a sense of unpredictability and the danger of adverse advancements throughout a management shift in a country with considerable geopolitical influence.

In general, Schily's quote encapsulates a minute of geopolitical anxiety, highlighting how shifts in political alliances and management in the Middle East have the potential to modify local dynamics and international relations significantly. It alerts of possible hazards tied to ideological extremism and the unpredictable nature of emerging political climates.