"And these great natural rights may be reduced to three principal or primary articles: the right of personal security; the right of personal liberty; and the right of private property; because as there is no other known method of compulsion, or of abridging man's natural free will, but by an infringement or diminution of one or other of these important rights, the preservation of these, inviolate, may justly be said to include the preservation of our civil immunities in their largest and most extensive sense"
About this Quote
Blackstone isn’t dreaming up lofty ideals so much as building a legal tripwire: touch these three rights and you’ve crossed into tyranny. Written in the idiom of an 18th-century judge, the passage works like a tidy syllogism dressed as common sense. Reduce “great natural rights” to three “primary articles,” and suddenly the sprawling mess of politics becomes legible, measurable, and therefore governable by courts.
The intent is strategic. By naming personal security, liberty, and property as the pillars, Blackstone makes state power legible in negative space: government is defined less by what it promises than by what it must not violate. His claim that “no other known method of compulsion” exists besides infringing these rights is rhetorical overreach, but it’s purposeful overreach. It flattens the many subtle ways authority pressures people (debt, social coercion, gatekeeping) into a courtroom-ready framework: show the infringement, prove the compulsion.
The subtext is also classed. Property sits alongside bodily safety and freedom as if it were equally elemental, smuggling a particular social order into the language of nature. For Blackstone, “civil immunities” aren’t aspirational benefits; they’re shields, especially for those with something to lose. That’s the context: an England anxious about arbitrary power, but also committed to a hierarchy secured through law. The sentence’s sheer length performs its authority, turning a political argument into something that sounds like a settled principle.
The intent is strategic. By naming personal security, liberty, and property as the pillars, Blackstone makes state power legible in negative space: government is defined less by what it promises than by what it must not violate. His claim that “no other known method of compulsion” exists besides infringing these rights is rhetorical overreach, but it’s purposeful overreach. It flattens the many subtle ways authority pressures people (debt, social coercion, gatekeeping) into a courtroom-ready framework: show the infringement, prove the compulsion.
The subtext is also classed. Property sits alongside bodily safety and freedom as if it were equally elemental, smuggling a particular social order into the language of nature. For Blackstone, “civil immunities” aren’t aspirational benefits; they’re shields, especially for those with something to lose. That’s the context: an England anxious about arbitrary power, but also committed to a hierarchy secured through law. The sentence’s sheer length performs its authority, turning a political argument into something that sounds like a settled principle.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book I, section on natural rights (commonly titled 'Of the Absolute Rights of Persons'), Commentaries (1765–1769) — passage enumerating the rights of personal security, personal liberty, and private property. |
More Quotes by William
Add to List








