"And we want to develop our strategy to partnership and friendship with the United States, which is connected with a very rich history but what is very important for our future"
About this Quote
Kwasniewski’s sentence is diplomacy doing what it does best: turning hard geopolitical arithmetic into the language of warmth. “Partnership and friendship” is a carefully paired phrase. Partnership signals interests, contracts, and security guarantees; friendship adds the soft-focus human glow that makes those interests feel principled rather than transactional. He’s not just courting Washington. He’s making an argument to multiple audiences at once: Americans who prefer loyal allies, Poles who remember abandonment and occupation, and Europeans wary of a too-intimate U.S. embrace.
The line’s small stumbles and piled-up clauses matter. The slightly awkward construction (“develop our strategy to partnership”) reads like a speaker working across languages, which can make the appeal sound less rehearsed and more earnest. That earnestness is useful cover for a strategic pivot: Poland’s post-Cold War project was to anchor itself in Western institutions, and the United States was the shortcut to credibility, security, and investment. When he mentions “a very rich history,” he’s invoking shared struggles and symbolic moments without naming the messy parts: shifting alliances, wartime betrayals, and the uncomfortable fact that history can be a warning as much as a bond.
The real emphasis lands on “very important for our future.” That’s the tell. History is the polite preface; the future is the ask. He’s framing U.S.-Polish closeness as not nostalgia but necessity, a forward-looking bargain that turns sentiment into strategy and makes dependence sound like choice.
The line’s small stumbles and piled-up clauses matter. The slightly awkward construction (“develop our strategy to partnership”) reads like a speaker working across languages, which can make the appeal sound less rehearsed and more earnest. That earnestness is useful cover for a strategic pivot: Poland’s post-Cold War project was to anchor itself in Western institutions, and the United States was the shortcut to credibility, security, and investment. When he mentions “a very rich history,” he’s invoking shared struggles and symbolic moments without naming the messy parts: shifting alliances, wartime betrayals, and the uncomfortable fact that history can be a warning as much as a bond.
The real emphasis lands on “very important for our future.” That’s the tell. History is the polite preface; the future is the ask. He’s framing U.S.-Polish closeness as not nostalgia but necessity, a forward-looking bargain that turns sentiment into strategy and makes dependence sound like choice.
Quote Details
| Topic | Friendship |
|---|
More Quotes by Aleksander
Add to List



