"And when people in power can stay in power they do very little to tinker with the apparatus that put them in power"

The quote by DeForest Soaries provides a crucial observation about the characteristics of power and governance. It presents the notion that those who attain positions of power frequently end up being reluctant to alter the conditions or systems that facilitated their climb. There is an implicit assertion that power tends to perpetuate itself and that keeping the status quo is in the interest of those presently gaining from it.

Soaries' declaration suggests that people or groups in power may withstand making changes to the structures or policies that enabled their rise since such tinkering might threaten their continued supremacy. This behavior reflects a natural human tendency to safeguard individual advantages and lessen risks related to change. Power, as soon as developed, creates vested interests, and those who hold it may prioritize sustaining their position over pursuing reforms that could be more equitable or helpful to society as a whole.

The idea also means an important view of political and organizational systems, highlighting a possible defect where the self-preserving nature of power can stifle innovation, versatility, and progress. When the prominent cling to existing frameworks, it can cause stagnancy, where only a choose few advantage while broader societal requirements remain unaddressed.

Additionally, this observation may apply to various contexts, from political regimes and corporate settings to social hierarchies and neighborhood companies. It resonates with the wider story of power being a double-edged sword; while it can be a force for favorable modification, it can likewise entrench variations and promote inertia.

In summary, DeForest Soaries' quote highlights a crucial reflection on power characteristics, emphasizing how the desire to keep authority can in some cases overshadow the crucial to evolve and improve systems for the greater good. It invites readers to examine the balance between stability and progress and to consider the ethical responsibilities of management.