"Any perjury case is a tough case. You just don't go on 'he said-she said.' You have to find corroborating evidence"

In the quote, Victoria Toensing highlights a critical element of legal strategy and the basic nature of perjury cases. Perjury, the act of lying or making incorrect statements under oath, presents particular challenges in legal procedures. Toensing emphasizes the trouble these cases present by stating, "Any perjury case is a hard case", which underscores the inherent complexities and demanding nature of showing that someone has actually intentionally tricked under oath.

The phrase, "You just don't go on 'he said-she said,'" even more shows the deficiency of simple conflicting testimonies in establishing perjury. The essence of her declaration is that the legal system needs more substantial evidence than just someone's word against another's. To put it simply, relying entirely on the divergent statements of people included does not reach the basic required to prosecute or show perjury. In court, "he said-she said" scenarios are often considered weak due to the equal weight offered to both sides and the absence of objective evidence pointing definitively to deceit.

Toensing demands the necessity of securing "corroborating evidence" in these cases. Substantiating proof is additional details that supports or validates the declarations made by a witness or the claims made by a party in the event. It boosts the story that one party is lying and assists tilt the balance of evidence in their favor. This evidence can come in various forms, such as files, digital records, eyewitness testament, or forensic proof, all serving to validate the claim that a private lied under oath.

In general, Toensing's quote clarifies the extensive standards legal practitioners must uphold when taking on perjury cases. It highlights the essential need for reputable, proven proof to validate allegations, showing the complexities and high concern of proof required in the justice system to found guilty someone of perjury.