"As a world view, Darwinism cannot of course be refuted, since Faith is, always has been, and always will be, stronger than facts"

Francis Parker Yockey's quote, "As a world view, Darwinism can not naturally be refuted, since Faith is, constantly has been, and always will be, more powerful than truths", provides an intricate intersection between science and belief systems. To translate this, we must initially consider what Yockey might imply by Darwinism and faith, especially in the context of his broader philosophical views.

Darwinism normally refers to the theory of biological advancement by natural choice, as created by Charles Darwin. It is grounded in empirical proof and the clinical method, which prioritizes observation, experimentation, and rational analysis. Yockey identifies Darwinism as a "world view", suggesting that it functions as a foundational, explanatory structure for understanding life and its diversity in the scientific community.

The latter part of Yockey's quote shifts focus to "Faith", presuming it as naturally stronger than factual proof. Here, faith is most likely suggested not simply in a religious sense but as any deeply held belief or ideology that continues beyond empirical evidence. Yockey seems to be discussing the perennial stress in between empirical science and deeply rooted belief systems-- whether they are spiritual, cultural, or ideological.

He articulates a hesitant position concerning the power of science to overturn entrenched belief systems. In spite of the robust evidence supporting advancement, Yockey recommends that humanity is such that faith-- by its nature subjective and impervious to specific kinds of examination-- will always hold sway. It's essential to recognize that Yockey isn't always discrediting Darwinism, but he observes a historical truth: people often focus on faith over realities when the two are in conflict.

This view may also reflect Yockey's own philosophical expeditions into culture and civilization, recommending that human societies are more governed by their intrinsic beliefs than by scientific improvements. Yockey's quote encapsulates a long-lasting dispute within human understanding: the negotiation in between knowledge substantiated by evidence and belief driven by faith or ideology. It challenges readers to think about the limits of both science and belief in shaping human point of views and social structures.