"At synods, I usually wait about a week before I speak. First I listen. I feel the temperature. I listen to what has been said, what has not been said, and what I think needs to be said at that point"

In the quote by Godfried Danneels, he reflects on a thoughtful approach to participation in synods, which are events typically within a spiritual context where issues are gone over and decisions are made. His statement stresses the significance of active listening and patience before adding to conversations. According to Danneels, speaking instantly upon arrival at a synod is not his method. Instead, he chooses to observe and listen for about a week. This method recommends a deep respect for the procedure of deliberation and the value of diverse point of views.

The phrase "I feel the temperature level" suggests his approach of evaluating the general state of mind and characteristics of the group. This metaphor recommends an awareness of the emotional and intellectual climate, enabling him to comprehend the context and undercurrents that may not be immediately obvious. By taking some time to listen to "what has been said" and "what has actually not been said", he acknowledges the value of both spoken words and the significant silences or omissions that can expose underlying concerns or dissent.

Additionally, Danneels highlights the important function of instinct and insight in identifying "what I believe needs to be said at that point". This suggests that reliable contributions are not only about supplying input however doing so when it is most timely and impactful. This method shows a deep understanding of collective discussion, where timing and sensitivity to the group's requirements can significantly affect results.

In general, Danneels's strategy underscores an important lesson in management and partnership: efficient communication frequently hinges on listening and discerning the ideal moment to step in. This fosters a more inclusive and reflective dialogue, allowing for a richer and more nuanced exploration of the concerns at hand. His method serves as an example of wisdom and restraint in discussions, which is particularly vital in settings that require consensus and cautious deliberation, such as synods.