"Both of them were the children of the United States. They sacrificed their children for the benefit of the others. But they were not very devoted children of the United States"

The quote by Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani touches on complex themes of nationwide identity, sacrifice, and commitment. Rafsanjani, a popular Iranian political leader, frames his observation through the metaphor of familial relationships, suggesting a deep connection between people (or groups) and their country, akin to that in between moms and dad and kid.

"Both of them were the children of the United States" indicates that the subjects in concern are items or outcomes of American culture, values, or policies. They may be individuals, political entities, or geopolitical allies supported by American impact and resources. This paints a photo of how countries raise and establish entities that align with their ideologies and interests.

The expression "They sacrificed their kids for the advantage of the others" suggests that these "children" made considerable sacrifices, likely including significant risks or costs, possibly in military, political, or financial spheres, benefiting others rather than themselves. This can be translated as an allusion to how nations often prioritize geopolitical methods and alliances, sometimes at the expense of their instant interests or those of their own offspring. The idea of sacrifice here highlights the concept of giving up something important for a perceived higher excellent, a typical theme in global relations.

Nevertheless, Rafsanjani concludes with "But they were not extremely devoted kids of the United States", using an important reflection on the commitment and loyalty of these entities to the U.S. Despite the nurturing and sacrifices made, these "children" do not fully embody the devotion or allegiance that might be expected in such a relationship. This might indicate a divergence between expected behaviors and actual actions, perhaps due to varying interests, values, or geopolitical truths. The quote can be viewed as a review of the complexities and contradictions inherent in global relations, where allegiance is not always guaranteed and can frequently be filled with completing interests and unexpected results.