"Both the historian and the novelist view history as the struggle of a tiny minority, able and determined to make judgments, which is up against a vast and densely packed majority of the blind, who are led by their instincts and unable to think for themselves"

Lion Feuchtwanger's quote reflects a point of view on the dynamics in between prominent people and the wider society throughout history. In this passage, Feuchtwanger draws a parallel in between historians and novelists, suggesting that both often perceive history as a drama focused around a minority of proactive, informative individuals. This elite, defined as able and figured out to make judgments, is posited as the driving force of historic change. This select group is depicted as having the clearness and conviction needed to form events, challenge dominating norms, and steer the course of human progress.

Contrasting this minority are the masses, illustrated as a "vast and densely packed majority" identified by loss of sight and instinctual behavior. Explaining the bulk as "blind" indicates a lack of awareness, insight, or vital thinking, implying that they move through life mainly assisted by instinctual or habitual patterns rather than conscious consideration. This description highlights a typical story where the general people is viewed as passive or resistant to change, unable to individually examine or alter their circumstances without the leadership of the discerning few.

Feuchtwanger's representation raises important questions about the nature of management, firm, and the function of people in societal change. It suggests a hierarchical dynamic where the insights and actions of a capable minority are necessary for getting rid of the inertia or resistance of the more comprehensive public. This interpretation may motivate reflection on the power dynamics within societies and the functions of leadership and followership.

Additionally, the quote recommends a deterministic view of history, in which genuine firm and development live primarily with a choose few. This perspective can be both empowering and elitist, triggering arguments on whether it underestimates communal efforts, grassroots motions, and the capacity of regular people to contribute meaningfully to historical advancements. Eventually, Feuchtwanger's words welcome vital examination of how we understand history and the interplay in between specific firm and cumulative momentum in forming human destiny.