"Burleigh, absolutely; and a lot about Elizabeth. I mean I found when I play Henry V a lot of connections with the hidden history of the connection between Francis Bacon and Elizabeth"

Mark Rylance's quote hints at interesting historical and literary connections, and it seems to show his immersive technique to interpreting and carrying out Shakespearean roles. Rylance, a renowned star and former artistic director of Shakespeare's Globe Theatre, typically delves deeply into the historical context of characters he depicts to enrich his efficiency.

In this quote, Rylance begins by referencing "Burleigh", likely describing William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley, who was a primary consultant to Queen Elizabeth I. Cecil was an essential figure in Elizabethan politics, aiding in the administration of the kingdom and in the orchestration of Elizabeth's federal government policy. His prominent function is vital to understanding the political landscape of Elizabeth's reign, which is often shown in the literature and drama of the time.

Rylance's reference of "a lot about Elizabeth" underscores the effect Queen Elizabeth I had on her period, which extended into the cultural and theatrical realms. Elizabeth's reign was marked by the thriving of English drama, consisting of Shakespeare's works. Rylance's interest may indicate an exploration of how Elizabeth's personality and monarchy infiltrated the styles and characters within Shakespeare's plays.

The quote further reveals Rylance's approach by keeping in mind the "hidden history of the connection between Francis Bacon and Elizabeth". Francis Bacon, a theorist, statesman, and contemporary of Shakespeare, has actually frequently been hypothesized upon by proponents of the Baconian theory-- which presumes that Bacon composed the works credited to Shakespeare. While mainstream scholars mainly dismiss this theory, it stays a location of curiosity and dispute, specifically offered Bacon's close association with the Elizabethan court.

In connecting his role as Henry V with these historical figures, Rylance seems to suggest that his preparation and efficiency are informed by an intricate network of historic, political, and literary connections. His interpretation likely seeks to bring a nuanced depth to the character of Henry V, illuminating how interwoven individual and political histories might have formed such renowned roles.