"But I would argue that a longer war it's more difficult to keep records than a shorter war"

In the quote by Christopher Shays, "However I would argue that a longer war it's more difficult to keep records than a much shorter war," a number of layers of interpretation can be explored, concentrating on the intricacies and obstacles fundamental in documentation throughout extended conflicts.

To start with, a longer war typically involves continual and dispersed operations across varying terrains and typically consists of several phases, each with its goals, methods, and challenges. This prolonged timeline increases the volume of data produced-- from battleground reports, supply chain logistics, military techniques, diplomatic communications, to humanitarian actions. The sheer amount of info makes detailed documents logistically challenging.

Moreover, in a prolonged dispute, there is frequently personnel turnover, consisting of soldiers, officers, and administrative personnel, which can cause inconsistencies in record-keeping practices. Different personnel may adopt varied approaches for documents, which might lead to fragmented or incompatible records. The continuity required to preserve precise and consistent records frequently succumbs to the transitory nature of military assignments.

Another considerable factor is the resource allotment during extended conflicts. As conflicts drag on, resources such as time, personnel, and funding, which may be devoted to administrative functions like record-keeping, are typically rerouted towards strategic and functional requirements, such as instant combat operations and logistics. This can lead to insufficient or disregarded paperwork procedures.

Furthermore, longer wars typically imply vibrant and moving alliances and goals. The continuously progressing nature of such disputes frequently suggests that records, once meticulously kept, may become obsolete or irrelevant, causing confusion or strategic error if trusted without appropriate context or updates.

Additionally, the psychological toll on those tasked with documentation must not be ignored. The stress and tiredness arising from prolonged exposure to dispute may affect the diligence and accuracy with which records are kept.

In essence, Shays' observation highlights the multifaceted obstacles associated with handling info over extended periods of dispute, assessing both the practical and human elements that contribute to difficulties in keeping accurate war records during extended engagements.