"But it is well to remember that we are dealing with nations every one of which has a direct individual interest to serve, and there is grave danger in an unshared idealism"
About this Quote
Lodge urges a sober view of international politics: nations pursue their own interests first, and lofty aspirations are perilous when only one side holds them. Idealism that is not shared becomes a vulnerability. It invites free riders who benefit from another states sacrifices without matching them, and it tempts opportunists to exploit a partner restrained by conscience while they are guided by advantage.
The line emerges from a career steeped in foreign policy realism. As a leading Republican senator in the early 20th century and chief foe of Woodrow Wilsons League of Nations, Lodge argued that collective security would falter if its burdens and commitments were not truly mutual. Article X, which seemed to bind the United States to defend other nations, exemplified to him the risk of pledging moral obligations that others might not honor in equal measure and that might override constitutional control of war. He did not reject engagement; he supported American power and alliances when they clearly served national interest. What he rejected was the faith that international harmony would arise from principles alone, absent enforceable reciprocity and respect for sovereignty.
The warning resonates beyond its moment. Unilateral disarmament, humanitarian interventions without shared commitment, or treaties that lack verification mechanisms often collide with the hard fact that incentives drive behavior. When ideals are woven into structures that align interests, they can endure; when they demand sacrifices only some are willing to make, frustration and backlash follow. Lodges counsel is to join aspiration to prudence: build institutions that distribute costs fairly, make obligations explicit, and ensure democratic consent at home. Idealism becomes safer when partnered with realism, because it then rests on a common foundation rather than a unilateral leap of faith.
The line emerges from a career steeped in foreign policy realism. As a leading Republican senator in the early 20th century and chief foe of Woodrow Wilsons League of Nations, Lodge argued that collective security would falter if its burdens and commitments were not truly mutual. Article X, which seemed to bind the United States to defend other nations, exemplified to him the risk of pledging moral obligations that others might not honor in equal measure and that might override constitutional control of war. He did not reject engagement; he supported American power and alliances when they clearly served national interest. What he rejected was the faith that international harmony would arise from principles alone, absent enforceable reciprocity and respect for sovereignty.
The warning resonates beyond its moment. Unilateral disarmament, humanitarian interventions without shared commitment, or treaties that lack verification mechanisms often collide with the hard fact that incentives drive behavior. When ideals are woven into structures that align interests, they can endure; when they demand sacrifices only some are willing to make, frustration and backlash follow. Lodges counsel is to join aspiration to prudence: build institutions that distribute costs fairly, make obligations explicit, and ensure democratic consent at home. Idealism becomes safer when partnered with realism, because it then rests on a common foundation rather than a unilateral leap of faith.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Henry
Add to List
