"But the Bible speaks against it, and because the Bible speaks against it, we allow rampant sin including homosexuality and lying, and to me lying is just as b ad as homosexuality, and we've allowed this sin to run rampant in our nation"
About this Quote
Reggie White invokes biblical authority to diagnose what he sees as national moral decay, placing homosexuality and lying under the same banner of sin. As an ordained minister and Hall of Fame defensive end, the self-styled Minister of Defense often carried scripture into the public square. Speaking before Wisconsin lawmakers in the late 1990s culture wars over sexuality and family values, he framed the issue not as a niche moral debate but as evidence of a society drifting from God.
The phrasing is awkward, but the intent is plain: when a culture rejects biblical norms, sin spreads. He draws on a common evangelical teaching that all sin separates from God, resisting the ranking of offenses. By equating lying with homosexuality, he tries to universalize guilt, casting the problem as human fallenness rather than a single community. Yet the effect is double-edged. The move can sound even-handed, but it still stigmatizes gay people by naming their identity alongside a moral failing, and it shifts the conversation from civic equality to religious compliance.
The language of rampant sin signals a belief that moral consensus once existed and has been eroded by permissiveness. Embedded in the claim is an assumption that scripture ought to shape public policy, a stance that clashes with a pluralistic order where citizens hold divergent authorities. That tension explains both the resonance and the backlash: supporters hear prophetic courage; critics hear theocratic overreach and harm to a marginalized group.
Context matters. The debate followed the Defense of Marriage Act and rising visibility of LGBTQ Americans. White’s comments sparked public criticism and professional scrutiny, underscoring how celebrity-faith interventions can amplify, and polarize, national conversations. His words reveal the power and peril of bringing pulpit rhetoric into civic arenas: a call to moral seriousness for some, a reminder for others that appeals to scripture can be used to police identity and constrain rights in a diverse democracy.
The phrasing is awkward, but the intent is plain: when a culture rejects biblical norms, sin spreads. He draws on a common evangelical teaching that all sin separates from God, resisting the ranking of offenses. By equating lying with homosexuality, he tries to universalize guilt, casting the problem as human fallenness rather than a single community. Yet the effect is double-edged. The move can sound even-handed, but it still stigmatizes gay people by naming their identity alongside a moral failing, and it shifts the conversation from civic equality to religious compliance.
The language of rampant sin signals a belief that moral consensus once existed and has been eroded by permissiveness. Embedded in the claim is an assumption that scripture ought to shape public policy, a stance that clashes with a pluralistic order where citizens hold divergent authorities. That tension explains both the resonance and the backlash: supporters hear prophetic courage; critics hear theocratic overreach and harm to a marginalized group.
Context matters. The debate followed the Defense of Marriage Act and rising visibility of LGBTQ Americans. White’s comments sparked public criticism and professional scrutiny, underscoring how celebrity-faith interventions can amplify, and polarize, national conversations. His words reveal the power and peril of bringing pulpit rhetoric into civic arenas: a call to moral seriousness for some, a reminder for others that appeals to scripture can be used to police identity and constrain rights in a diverse democracy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Bible |
|---|
More Quotes by Reggie
Add to List
