"Certainly the party counts a considerable number of intellectuals among its members, but I am by no means disposed to apologise for that"

The quote from Harry Oppenheimer, a prominent South African business person and politician, uses a nuanced perspective on the function and perception of intellectuals within political motions or celebrations. Oppenheimer acknowledges the existence of a significant number of intellectuals within his political celebration. His use of the word "considerable" suggests not simply a numeric count but an implication that these people hold considerable impact or significance within the party. This statement could be viewed as an acknowledgment of the value intellectuals bring, as their existence indicates a dedication to informed decision-making, thoughtful analysis, and nuanced dispute.

The subsequent part of the quote, "however I am by no ways disposed to apologise for that", exposes a hidden tension or criticism typically directed at intellectualism, particularly in political contexts. Intellectuals are sometimes seen with apprehension in politics, viewed as being detached from the everyday concerns or practical truths faced by normal people. By specifying he is not "gotten rid of to apologise", Oppenheimer is verifying his stance that the addition and influence of intellectuals are not flaws or errors that require validation or defense.

Oppenheimer's insistence on not saying sorry underscores a rejection to yield to populist reviews that may undervalue intellectual contributions as elitist or out of touch. He implicitly argues that the intellectual rigor and insight these members supply is helpful and even vital to the celebration's function and success. By welcoming their participation, he recommends that intellectuals play a crucial function in shaping policies that are well-informed and thoughtful of complex socio-economic truths.

In essence, Oppenheimer's quote is a defense of intellectual engagement in politics, stressing that having actually a party enhanced with intellectual thinkers must be viewed as an asset rather than a liability. It recommends a belief in the strength and depth that intellectualism can contribute to political discourse, policy advancement, and management.