"Children from a given family background, when put in schools of different social compositions, will achieve at quite different levels"
About this Quote
Coleman points to a force often stronger than any single family’s efforts: the social composition of the school. The same child, with the same home background, learns differently when surrounded by peers who bring different norms, expectations, and resources to the classroom. Achievement is not only an individual trait; it is a product of the surrounding network of students, parents, and teachers, and the culture that network sustains.
The line distills a central finding of the 1966 Equality of Educational Opportunity report, which shocked policymakers by suggesting that school inputs like spending or facilities mattered less than the peer environment and the broader social mix. Where high expectations, academic norms, and strong ties between families and schools are common, students are pulled upward by example and by opportunity. Where disadvantage is concentrated, the reverse dynamics often appear: fewer experienced peers to model success, weaker information networks, more classroom time devoted to remediation, and lowered expectations that quietly shape effort and outcomes.
The mechanism is not mystical. Students learn from one another; teachers calibrate instruction and discipline to the room they face; extracurriculars flourish where participation is widespread; parents share tips about courses, tutoring, and college. These forms of social capital scale with the composition of the student body. Composition also interacts with tracking inside schools, which can replicate segregation even under a shared roof.
Coleman’s claim became a cornerstone of debates over desegregation, busing, magnet schools, and, more recently, socioeconomic integration and controlled choice. Research since has refined, not erased, the point: peer effects are real, though they can vary by age, subject, and the design of integration. The lesson invites a shift from blaming individual families to changing contexts. If achievement moves with the social environment, then policy that reduces the isolation of poverty and mixes students across lines of race and income can expand opportunity without waiting for every household to change on its own.
The line distills a central finding of the 1966 Equality of Educational Opportunity report, which shocked policymakers by suggesting that school inputs like spending or facilities mattered less than the peer environment and the broader social mix. Where high expectations, academic norms, and strong ties between families and schools are common, students are pulled upward by example and by opportunity. Where disadvantage is concentrated, the reverse dynamics often appear: fewer experienced peers to model success, weaker information networks, more classroom time devoted to remediation, and lowered expectations that quietly shape effort and outcomes.
The mechanism is not mystical. Students learn from one another; teachers calibrate instruction and discipline to the room they face; extracurriculars flourish where participation is widespread; parents share tips about courses, tutoring, and college. These forms of social capital scale with the composition of the student body. Composition also interacts with tracking inside schools, which can replicate segregation even under a shared roof.
Coleman’s claim became a cornerstone of debates over desegregation, busing, magnet schools, and, more recently, socioeconomic integration and controlled choice. Research since has refined, not erased, the point: peer effects are real, though they can vary by age, subject, and the design of integration. The lesson invites a shift from blaming individual families to changing contexts. If achievement moves with the social environment, then policy that reduces the isolation of poverty and mixes students across lines of race and income can expand opportunity without waiting for every household to change on its own.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|---|
| Source | James S. Coleman et al., Equality of Educational Opportunity (U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1966) — the 'Coleman Report', discusses how school social composition affects student achievement. |
More Quotes by James
Add to List
