"Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine. It may make you feel like you're flying high at first, but it won't take long before you feel the impact"
About this Quote
Obama uses an aviation metaphor to argue that short-term budget fixes can sabotage long-term prosperity. An overloaded airplane tempts the crew to toss out weight, but removing the engine dooms the flight. Likewise, slashing public investment in innovation and education might shrink deficits on paper, yet it strips the economy of the very power that drives growth, productivity, and higher incomes. The immediate numbers look better, the plane feels lighter, but the underlying capacity to move forward has been crippled.
The line comes out of the post-recession battles over austerity and stimulus, when Washington wrestled with deficits, sequestration, and the debt ceiling. Obama sought to reframe spending on research, schools, community colleges, and infrastructure as engines rather than baggage. Economically, the argument echoes both Keynesian stabilization and long-run growth theory: investments in human capital and R&D create spillovers that private markets underprovide, raising future output and, by extension, future tax revenues. Cut them deeply and you may reduce the deficit now while enlarging it later through slower growth and weaker competitiveness.
The phrase you feel like you are flying high at first captures the political appeal of austerity. It delivers quick, measurable savings and satisfies calls for discipline. But feel the impact warns of the delayed consequences: diminished innovation pipelines, a less skilled workforce, and an economy that cannot accelerate when conditions improve. The metaphor also invites a business-minded reading. No serious firm balances its books by canceling all product development and worker training; it trims fat, not the engine.
There is a moral undercurrent, too. Education is both an economic input and a promise of mobility. Gutting it harms not just GDP but the ladder of opportunity. The challenge, as Obama frames it, is not whether to be fiscally responsible, but how. Responsibility means aligning cuts with a strategy that preserves the capacity to grow, so the plane can climb rather than glide into a stall.
The line comes out of the post-recession battles over austerity and stimulus, when Washington wrestled with deficits, sequestration, and the debt ceiling. Obama sought to reframe spending on research, schools, community colleges, and infrastructure as engines rather than baggage. Economically, the argument echoes both Keynesian stabilization and long-run growth theory: investments in human capital and R&D create spillovers that private markets underprovide, raising future output and, by extension, future tax revenues. Cut them deeply and you may reduce the deficit now while enlarging it later through slower growth and weaker competitiveness.
The phrase you feel like you are flying high at first captures the political appeal of austerity. It delivers quick, measurable savings and satisfies calls for discipline. But feel the impact warns of the delayed consequences: diminished innovation pipelines, a less skilled workforce, and an economy that cannot accelerate when conditions improve. The metaphor also invites a business-minded reading. No serious firm balances its books by canceling all product development and worker training; it trims fat, not the engine.
There is a moral undercurrent, too. Education is both an economic input and a promise of mobility. Gutting it harms not just GDP but the ladder of opportunity. The challenge, as Obama frames it, is not whether to be fiscally responsible, but how. Responsibility means aligning cuts with a strategy that preserves the capacity to grow, so the plane can climb rather than glide into a stall.
Quote Details
| Topic | Investment |
|---|
More Quotes by Barack
Add to List
