"Democrats couldn't care less if people in Indiana hate them. But if Europeans curl their lips, liberals can't look at themselves in the mirror"

Ann Coulter's quote highlights a perceived dichotomy in the mindsets of liberals, particularly within the Democratic Party, towards domestic versus international understandings. Her option of words aims to underscore the concept that Democrats are indifferent to criticism or unpopularity in specific domestic locations, such as Indiana, which she suggests may not be a central focus or a significant source of political assistance for them. The state is likely utilized symbolically to represent parts of the United States that might lean more conservative or typically Republican and where Democrats might have a hard time to get significant traction or support.

Coulter contrasts this indifference with a supposed hypersensitivity to European viewpoints. By specifying that liberals "can't look at themselves in the mirror" if Europeans "curl their lips," she recommends that liberals place a high value on worldwide approval, particularly from Europe. This could stem from the understanding that Europe represents a design of social progressiveness and cultural elegance that aligns with liberal worths. In essence, this part of the quote suggests that liberals, according to Coulter, are more interested in aligning themselves with worldwide, particularly European, perspectives and judgments than with winning over or listening to particular sectors of the American population.

The reference to a mirror worries an internal reflection and identity problem; it suggests a requirement for external validation from a global audience for self-acceptance, as opposed to focusing on domestic approval or acceptance amongst constituents who hold varying views.

In general, the quote is most likely planned to slam what Coulter views as a disparity in concerns among liberals: caring more about their image on the world stage than about resonating with and dealing with the issues of Americans in locations that may not normally support them. It reflects broader stories in U.S. political discourse relating to globalism versus nationalism and the worth placed on foreign versus domestic approval.