"Design is a plan for arranging elements in such a way as best to accomplish a particular purpose"
About this Quote
Eames’ line strips “design” of its aura and hands it back to the workshop: not a mystical talent, not an aesthetic mood board, but a plan. That word matters. A plan implies constraints, trade-offs, sequencing, and accountability. It also quietly demotes style from the driver’s seat. Beauty can be a byproduct, even a tool, but purpose is the boss.
The subtext is an argument with two familiar cultural myths: that design is decoration, and that design is self-expression. Eames isn’t denying pleasure or personality; he’s insisting they earn their keep. “Arranging elements” is deliberately broad, covering a chair, an exhibition, a film, a corporate identity, even a wayfinding system. The phrase “best to accomplish” sneaks in a standard that’s both pragmatic and unsettling: best for whom, and measured how? Comfort, cost, durability, status, sustainability, accessibility, manufacturability - all can be “purpose,” and they can collide. Eames’ definition doesn’t pretend those conflicts disappear; it frames design as the discipline of choosing in public.
Context sharpens the point. In mid-century America, Eames operated where modernism met mass production, where a plywood shell had to satisfy the body, the factory, and the living room. His work with Herman Miller and his exhibitions for IBM treated design as systems thinking before that phrase got trendy: align materials, human behavior, and industrial realities toward an outcome.
The line still lands because it’s a polite rebuke to design-as-vibes. If you can’t name the purpose, you’re not designing; you’re arranging.
The subtext is an argument with two familiar cultural myths: that design is decoration, and that design is self-expression. Eames isn’t denying pleasure or personality; he’s insisting they earn their keep. “Arranging elements” is deliberately broad, covering a chair, an exhibition, a film, a corporate identity, even a wayfinding system. The phrase “best to accomplish” sneaks in a standard that’s both pragmatic and unsettling: best for whom, and measured how? Comfort, cost, durability, status, sustainability, accessibility, manufacturability - all can be “purpose,” and they can collide. Eames’ definition doesn’t pretend those conflicts disappear; it frames design as the discipline of choosing in public.
Context sharpens the point. In mid-century America, Eames operated where modernism met mass production, where a plywood shell had to satisfy the body, the factory, and the living room. His work with Herman Miller and his exhibitions for IBM treated design as systems thinking before that phrase got trendy: align materials, human behavior, and industrial realities toward an outcome.
The line still lands because it’s a polite rebuke to design-as-vibes. If you can’t name the purpose, you’re not designing; you’re arranging.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Quote attributed to Charles Eames; cited on the Charles Eames page on Wikiquote (no primary source given). |
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List



