"Don't believe that winning is really everything. It's more important to stand for something. If you don't stand for something, what do you win?"
About this Quote
American culture often celebrates the scoreboard: points, market share, polls. Lane Kirkland pushes back, insisting that victory stripped of purpose is hollow. Winning is not an ultimate good; it is a tool that should serve a conviction about what is right. The closing question, "If you do not stand for something, what do you win?" turns the logic of competition inside out. A triumph achieved at the cost of integrity or solidarity is not success but self-negation.
Kirkland knew that terrain well. As president of the AFL-CIO from 1979 to 1995, he led organized labor through deindustrialization, political headwinds, and the spectacle of the PATCO strike. He championed workers rights at home and backed democratic labor movements abroad, most famously supporting Polands Solidarity. In those struggles, the point was never victory for its own sake. Negotiating a contract or winning a political fight mattered only if it advanced safety, dignity, fair wages, and democratic voice. A deal that padded numbers while abandoning the people those numbers represent would have betrayed the movement.
The line also reads as a warning to leaders in any field. A CEO who crushes competitors by exploiting workers, a campaign that secures office by sowing cynicism, a creator who courts fame by abandoning craft all win something and lose something larger. The scoreboard may register success while the social ledger shows damage. Standing for something provides the compass that aligns means with ends, ensuring that achievement builds rather than corrodes.
The message is not an argument for martyrdom or complacency. It is a redefinition of success: measurable outcomes grounded in moral purpose. When principle guides ambition, victories earn their meaning and losses can still teach. Without that anchor, even the most glittering win evaporates the moment you ask what it was for.
Kirkland knew that terrain well. As president of the AFL-CIO from 1979 to 1995, he led organized labor through deindustrialization, political headwinds, and the spectacle of the PATCO strike. He championed workers rights at home and backed democratic labor movements abroad, most famously supporting Polands Solidarity. In those struggles, the point was never victory for its own sake. Negotiating a contract or winning a political fight mattered only if it advanced safety, dignity, fair wages, and democratic voice. A deal that padded numbers while abandoning the people those numbers represent would have betrayed the movement.
The line also reads as a warning to leaders in any field. A CEO who crushes competitors by exploiting workers, a campaign that secures office by sowing cynicism, a creator who courts fame by abandoning craft all win something and lose something larger. The scoreboard may register success while the social ledger shows damage. Standing for something provides the compass that aligns means with ends, ensuring that achievement builds rather than corrodes.
The message is not an argument for martyrdom or complacency. It is a redefinition of success: measurable outcomes grounded in moral purpose. When principle guides ambition, victories earn their meaning and losses can still teach. Without that anchor, even the most glittering win evaporates the moment you ask what it was for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Lane
Add to List
