"Especially right after 9/11. Especially when the war in Afghanistan is going on. There was a real sense that you don't get that critical of a government that's leading us in war time"
About this Quote
Isaacson’s repetition of “Especially” works like a drumbeat of social pressure: not just a time marker but a moral cudgel. He’s describing a post-9/11 atmosphere where critique didn’t merely feel unpopular; it felt suspect. The line “a real sense” is doing careful, almost journalistic work. It signals that this wasn’t a formal policy of censorship, but something more slippery and often more effective: an ambient consensus enforced by peers, editors, audiences, and institutions trying to prove their solidarity.
The subtext is about patriotism as a behavioral test. “You don’t get that critical” isn’t a neutral observation; it’s a boundary line. The phrase “government that’s leading us in war time” frames the state as a collective “us,” collapsing the distance between leadership and citizenry. That rhetorical move makes dissent feel like betrayal not of a party or president but of the group itself, especially when soldiers are deployed and trauma is still fresh.
Context matters: early 2000s media and political culture rewarded deference and punished skepticism, particularly around national security claims. Isaacson, as a writer and institutional insider, is implicitly pointing to how easily democratic ideals of scrutiny become conditional during crisis. The intent isn’t to relitigate Afghanistan so much as to map how wartime logic colonizes everyday speech: criticism becomes “too much,” timing becomes “inappropriate,” and the public sphere quietly narrows while everyone insists it’s still wide open.
The subtext is about patriotism as a behavioral test. “You don’t get that critical” isn’t a neutral observation; it’s a boundary line. The phrase “government that’s leading us in war time” frames the state as a collective “us,” collapsing the distance between leadership and citizenry. That rhetorical move makes dissent feel like betrayal not of a party or president but of the group itself, especially when soldiers are deployed and trauma is still fresh.
Context matters: early 2000s media and political culture rewarded deference and punished skepticism, particularly around national security claims. Isaacson, as a writer and institutional insider, is implicitly pointing to how easily democratic ideals of scrutiny become conditional during crisis. The intent isn’t to relitigate Afghanistan so much as to map how wartime logic colonizes everyday speech: criticism becomes “too much,” timing becomes “inappropriate,” and the public sphere quietly narrows while everyone insists it’s still wide open.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Walter
Add to List




