"Even if I was a bad right wing guy, to the extent of whether my arguments are right or wrong, they're right or wrong independently if I'm right or left"

In this quote, Bjorn Lomborg highlights an essential principle of vital thinking and intellectual discourse: the objective assessment of arguments. Lomborg recommends that the credibility of an argument need to not be judged based on the personal or political associations of the individual presenting it. Rather, arguments need to be examined and evaluated based on their own benefits, proof, reasoning, and reasoning.

The opening phrase, "Even if I was a bad conservative guy", shows Lomborg's recommendation of prospective biases or unfavorable understandings that might be related to a particular political stance. By using "bad", he perhaps mentions generalizations or stereotypes that may be attributed to individuals with conservative beliefs. However, he highlights that such labels ought to not eclipse the substance of the arguments being presented.

Lomborg continues with "to the extent of whether my arguments are best or incorrect", underscoring that the focus ought to be on the truthfulness and stability of the arguments themselves. Here, Lomborg appeals to the idea of neutrality, prompting the examination of ideas without prejudgment based on political leaning.

Lastly, Lomborg concludes with "they're right or wrong separately if I'm right or left", enhancing the message that the correctness of an argument is independent of its association with any political orientation. This part of the quote underscores the universality of truth and reasoning, highlighting that perfects such as evidence-based thinking and critical analysis transcend political borders.

Overall, Lomborg's declaration works as a pointer to take part in thoughtful and objective discussion, where concepts are assessed on their content rather than the personal qualities or associations of those who propose them. This approach motivates a more constructive exchange of ideas, ultimately fostering a deeper understanding and progress in societal discourse.