"Everybody's for democracy in principle. It's only in practice that the thing gives rise to stiff objections"
About this Quote
Democracy is the safe word of modern politics: everyone claims it, few want the full experience. Meg Greenfield’s line works because it punctures the piety without sounding anti-democratic. She’s not mocking the ideal; she’s exposing the quiet hypocrisy baked into how power actually behaves when voters, courts, or legislatures produce inconvenient outcomes.
The phrasing is editor-sharp. “In principle” is where reputations are made: politicians salute “the people,” regimes hold “elections,” institutions brand themselves as guardians of “democratic norms.” But “in practice” is where interests take losses, coalitions fracture, and procedural purity gets re-labeled as dysfunction. Greenfield’s “stiff objections” is doing heavy lifting: it suggests not casual disappointment but sudden, rigid resistance-the kind that appears when the majority isn’t your majority, when rights claims collide, when the press won’t play ball, or when institutions stop delivering predictable winners.
Context matters: Greenfield came of age professionally in a Cold War America that treated “democracy” as both moral identity and geopolitical marketing. In that climate, the word became a civic incense burned at every ceremony. Editors like Greenfield were trained to notice when rhetoric outruns reality: “democracy” is celebrated until it empowers movements that threaten established arrangements, until participation becomes noisy, until pluralism produces paralysis.
Her intent is corrective, not cynical for its own sake. The subtext is a challenge to readers who love democratic symbolism but resent democratic consequences: if you only support democracy when it ratifies your preferences, you’re not for democracy-you’re for winning.
The phrasing is editor-sharp. “In principle” is where reputations are made: politicians salute “the people,” regimes hold “elections,” institutions brand themselves as guardians of “democratic norms.” But “in practice” is where interests take losses, coalitions fracture, and procedural purity gets re-labeled as dysfunction. Greenfield’s “stiff objections” is doing heavy lifting: it suggests not casual disappointment but sudden, rigid resistance-the kind that appears when the majority isn’t your majority, when rights claims collide, when the press won’t play ball, or when institutions stop delivering predictable winners.
Context matters: Greenfield came of age professionally in a Cold War America that treated “democracy” as both moral identity and geopolitical marketing. In that climate, the word became a civic incense burned at every ceremony. Editors like Greenfield were trained to notice when rhetoric outruns reality: “democracy” is celebrated until it empowers movements that threaten established arrangements, until participation becomes noisy, until pluralism produces paralysis.
Her intent is corrective, not cynical for its own sake. The subtext is a challenge to readers who love democratic symbolism but resent democratic consequences: if you only support democracy when it ratifies your preferences, you’re not for democracy-you’re for winning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Later attribution: Ethics in Health Administration: A Practical Approach for... (Eileen E. Morrison, 2009) modern compilationISBN: 9781449600990 · ID: 5pZW4YBhvBUC
Evidence:
... Everybody's for democracy in principle. It's only in practice that the thing gives rise to stiff objections. —Meg Greenfield Points to Ponder 1. Why is health care subjected to so many rules and regulations? 2. What do healthcare ... |
More Quotes by Meg
Add to List





