"Everything that used to be a sin is now a disease"
About this Quote
Maher’s line lands because it’s a neat little insult disguised as diagnosis. It compresses a whole culture-war argument into a single swap: moral language (“sin”) has been traded for clinical language (“disease”), and we’re supposed to feel the loss. As a comedian, he’s not building a taxonomy; he’s throwing a dart at the modern habit of laundering behavior through pathology. The joke is the reversal: what once carried shame and accountability now comes with a treatment plan, a label, maybe even a protected status.
The subtext is impatience with what he sees as the therapeutic state: a culture that prefers explanations to judgments, and accommodations to consequences. “Used to be” does a lot of work, hinting at a sturdier past when social boundaries were clearer and guilt was a feature, not a bug. “Now” marks the present as softer, more self-exculpating, and a little smug about its compassion.
Context matters: Maher’s long-running persona is the libertarian-ish scold of liberal America, someone who shares progressive instincts on religion but hates progressive pieties around identity and harm. So the line is also a two-front jab: at religious moralism for calling human messiness “sin,” and at secular moralism for repackaging judgment in medical terms. He’s saying we didn’t eliminate condemnation; we rebranded it. A sinner can repent; a patient can only comply. That’s the provocation underneath the punchline.
The subtext is impatience with what he sees as the therapeutic state: a culture that prefers explanations to judgments, and accommodations to consequences. “Used to be” does a lot of work, hinting at a sturdier past when social boundaries were clearer and guilt was a feature, not a bug. “Now” marks the present as softer, more self-exculpating, and a little smug about its compassion.
Context matters: Maher’s long-running persona is the libertarian-ish scold of liberal America, someone who shares progressive instincts on religion but hates progressive pieties around identity and harm. So the line is also a two-front jab: at religious moralism for calling human messiness “sin,” and at secular moralism for repackaging judgment in medical terms. He’s saying we didn’t eliminate condemnation; we rebranded it. A sinner can repent; a patient can only comply. That’s the provocation underneath the punchline.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bill
Add to List




