"Evil always turns up in this world through some genius or other"
About this Quote
Diderot turns the cult of brilliance on its head, warning that destructive forces often arrive dressed as originality, vision, and daring intellect. Genius here is not a moral endorsement but a capacity to amplify consequences. An ordinary malefactor can wound a neighbor; a gifted mind can design a system that wounds millions, complete with persuasive justifications, efficient mechanisms, and an aura of inevitability.
As a leading figure of the Enlightenment and editor of the Encyclopedie, Diderot championed reason while remaining wary of its temptations. He saw how erudition could serve dogma and power, how theologians, jurists, and philosophers could invent elegant scaffolding for injustice, and how scientific ingenuity could furnish tools of surveillance and war as readily as medicine and art. The phrase gathers this skepticism into a compact caution: the most ruinous forms of evil are rarely crude; they are engineered, theorized, and rhetorically polished by someone brilliant enough to make vice look like virtue or necessity.
There is also a democratic subtext. Diderot favored collective scrutiny over the mystique of the lone genius. Knowledge, when dispersed and contested, is less likely to harden into tyranny. When vested in a single dazzling figure, it more easily escapes correction and seduces followers who confuse intellectual audacity with moral wisdom. He knew firsthand the charisma of towering minds, and he also saw the quarrels, vanities, and misjudgments that accompany them.
The warning is not anti-intellectual; it is an ethical demand placed on intellect. Celebrate invention, but insist on humility, transparency, and debate. Prize the spark of genius, but tie it to institutions, norms, and publics capable of saying no. Evil often needs a designer before it needs an army. Refusing to idolize brilliance is one way to keep design in the service of human flourishing rather than domination.
As a leading figure of the Enlightenment and editor of the Encyclopedie, Diderot championed reason while remaining wary of its temptations. He saw how erudition could serve dogma and power, how theologians, jurists, and philosophers could invent elegant scaffolding for injustice, and how scientific ingenuity could furnish tools of surveillance and war as readily as medicine and art. The phrase gathers this skepticism into a compact caution: the most ruinous forms of evil are rarely crude; they are engineered, theorized, and rhetorically polished by someone brilliant enough to make vice look like virtue or necessity.
There is also a democratic subtext. Diderot favored collective scrutiny over the mystique of the lone genius. Knowledge, when dispersed and contested, is less likely to harden into tyranny. When vested in a single dazzling figure, it more easily escapes correction and seduces followers who confuse intellectual audacity with moral wisdom. He knew firsthand the charisma of towering minds, and he also saw the quarrels, vanities, and misjudgments that accompany them.
The warning is not anti-intellectual; it is an ethical demand placed on intellect. Celebrate invention, but insist on humility, transparency, and debate. Prize the spark of genius, but tie it to institutions, norms, and publics capable of saying no. Evil often needs a designer before it needs an army. Refusing to idolize brilliance is one way to keep design in the service of human flourishing rather than domination.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Denis
Add to List
