"Families with babies and families without babies are sorry for each other"
About this Quote
The intent is editorial in the old-school sense: a compact observation about the moral weather of ordinary life. Babies are less a subject than a symbol of competing narratives. For parents, the childless look free, rested, unburdened by diapers and the endless vigilance that turns time into a scarce resource. For the childless, parents look trapped: financially squeezed, socially sidelined, their identities reorganized around someone else’s needs. Each side frames its own condition as a kind of sacrifice and treats the other’s as either enviable privilege or avoidable mistake.
That symmetry is the subtext’s sting. Howe exposes how modern status works: we measure our lives by what they cost us, then demand recognition for the bill. Coming from a newspaper editor in late-19th/early-20th-century America, the line also sits in an era when “family” was both civic ideal and private strain. Howe doesn’t romanticize babies or dismiss them; he points at the transactional pity people use to keep their choices feeling inevitable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Parenting |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Howe, Edgar Watson. (2026, January 15). Families with babies and families without babies are sorry for each other. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/families-with-babies-and-families-without-babies-141136/
Chicago Style
Howe, Edgar Watson. "Families with babies and families without babies are sorry for each other." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/families-with-babies-and-families-without-babies-141136/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Families with babies and families without babies are sorry for each other." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/families-with-babies-and-families-without-babies-141136/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.









