"Films and gramophone records, music, books and buildings show clearly how vigorously a man's life and work go on after his "death," whether we feel it or not, whether we are aware of the individual names or not. There is no such thing as death according to our view!"
About this Quote
Bormann points to the stubborn afterlife of human works. Films, records, music, books, and buildings preserve voices and intentions long after the bodies that made them are gone. The twist lies in his conclusion: there is no such thing as death, not because souls endure, but because culture and institutions extend a persons influence beyond the grave. It is a secular immortality, secured by media and monuments rather than faith.
Placed in the world Bormann helped administer, the statement reads as programmatic. The Nazi project sought permanence through spectacle and stone: Leni Riefenstahls films that monumentalized the movement, gramophone recordings of speeches that could be replayed endlessly, and Albert Speers architecture designed with ruin value to communicate grandeur even in decay. The emphasis on endurance also echoes the rhetoric of a Thousand-Year Reich, where individual lives were to dissolve into a collective destiny. His aside about names not mattering signals a deliberate suppression of individual authorship; what counts is the ongoing power of the work as it serves the cause.
There is a grim utility here. If death is nothing because the work continues, then sacrifice becomes easy to demand, and moral responsibility easier to blur. Cultural afterlife can indeed keep ideas alive, but it can also make harmful ideologies linger, outlasting those who set them in motion. Bormann, who was hostile to Christianity, replaces spiritual afterlife with a political one, a faith in the Reichs memory machine.
The insight remains double-edged. Art, media, and architecture do animate the dead; they carry forward thought and feeling, sometimes anonymously. Yet what endures is not neutral. Memory can testify against its makers as well as celebrate them. In that sense, his claim is true only to the degree that history allows: the dead do not disappear, but neither do their works escape judgment.
Placed in the world Bormann helped administer, the statement reads as programmatic. The Nazi project sought permanence through spectacle and stone: Leni Riefenstahls films that monumentalized the movement, gramophone recordings of speeches that could be replayed endlessly, and Albert Speers architecture designed with ruin value to communicate grandeur even in decay. The emphasis on endurance also echoes the rhetoric of a Thousand-Year Reich, where individual lives were to dissolve into a collective destiny. His aside about names not mattering signals a deliberate suppression of individual authorship; what counts is the ongoing power of the work as it serves the cause.
There is a grim utility here. If death is nothing because the work continues, then sacrifice becomes easy to demand, and moral responsibility easier to blur. Cultural afterlife can indeed keep ideas alive, but it can also make harmful ideologies linger, outlasting those who set them in motion. Bormann, who was hostile to Christianity, replaces spiritual afterlife with a political one, a faith in the Reichs memory machine.
The insight remains double-edged. Art, media, and architecture do animate the dead; they carry forward thought and feeling, sometimes anonymously. Yet what endures is not neutral. Memory can testify against its makers as well as celebrate them. In that sense, his claim is true only to the degree that history allows: the dead do not disappear, but neither do their works escape judgment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List
