"First of all - I only believe what I see"

Moira Kelly’s statement, "First of all – I only believe what I see", captures an attitude rooted in skepticism and empiricism. Such a perspective underscores a reliance on direct experience as the primary measuring stick for truth. By insisting that only observable events or tangible evidence shape belief, she aligns herself with a worldview that values the concrete over the abstract, intuition, or hearsay.

Believing only in what is visibly verified provides a safeguard against deception, manipulation, and unfounded rumors. It conveys a desire for authenticity and accuracy, suggesting that reality is best grasped through one’s own senses rather than secondhand information or speculation. This approach can act as a filter, ensuring that opinions and decisions are grounded in facts, not fantasies.

However, this stance also comes with limitations. Many aspects of life, emotions, motivations, or even scientific concepts like gravity before it was empirically described, are not always immediately visible. Strict adherence to only accepting visible proof might close off openness to possibilities, intuition, or trust in others’ experiences. The world is full of phenomena that elude direct observation yet can be critically important, such as love, trust, consciousness, or even subatomic particles. Dismissing these just because they aren’t seen may reduce the richness of human understanding.

Moreover, this attitude can signal a kind of self-reliance: an insistence on personal discernment and the necessity of forming one’s own judgments. It reflects a guard against gullibility. Yet, it might also betray a resistance to vulnerability, an unwillingness to admit that some truths are accepted on faith or trust.

Ultimately, prioritizing first-hand evidence is a rational response to uncertainty in an ambiguous world, yet it may require balance, recognizing that not everything valuable can be seen, touched, or fully understood through empirical means alone.