"For me the much more significant question is what did the Americans do, if anything, to help the Croatian army, because they are the ones that changed fundamentally the map of Bosnia, not the Bosnian army"

In this quote, John Pomfret raises an interesting point about the characteristics of military and political intervention during the Bosnian War, which happened from 1992 to 1995. By framing his observation around the role of the United States and the Croatian army, Pomfret suggests that external influence and assistance were pivotal in altering the course of the conflict, particularly the territorial delineation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

At the heart of the declaration is the implication that the Croatian army, maybe more than the regional Bosnian forces, played a definitive function in forming the result of the war. This viewpoint invites a conversation about the strategies and support systems put in location during the conflict, especially focusing on the relationship in between worldwide actors and local military forces.

Pomfret's inquiry about the extent of American involvement challenges us to consider the wider geopolitical methods used by effective countries throughout the 1990s in the Balkans. The mention of "assistance" recommends different kinds of possible support, varying from direct military aid and training to intelligence sharing and strategic planning. By prioritizing what the Americans may have done to help the Croatian army, Pomfret's quote encourages analysis over how such support could have slanted the balance in favor of Croatian forces, consequently changing the territorial and political landscape of Bosnia.

Moreover, Pomfret's insight opens a discussion about the viewed versus actual efficiency of regional versus international efforts in dispute resolution and nation-building. It reflects a crucial evaluation of the interventions undertaken by worldwide powers, questioning the motivations behind these actions and the results they produced.

In essence, the quote underscores the complexities of worldwide military assistance and its long-lasting influence on regional conflicts and post-war territorial arrangements. It beckons an expedition of the ethical and useful implications of such interventions, provoking more query into how these dynamics unfold in similar global situations.