"For two years living in a neutral country I have been able to see through the haze of propaganda to reach something which my conscience tells me is the truth"

The quote by John Amery shows an individual journey of understanding and ideological improvement while residing in a neutral nation during a period of substantial propaganda, most likely throughout The second world war. Amery, a British fascist known for his controversial views and actions, utilizes this declaration to convey his sense of clarity and enlightenment after distancing himself from the influence of belligerent nations' wartime propaganda.

The expression "living in a neutral nation" recommends that Amery found himself in an environment devoid of the direct pressures and biases that nations involved in the war might impose on their people. Neutrality in this context indicates a space where various point of views might be considered more easily, without the instant influence of nationalistic or militaristic programs. This geographical and political neutrality supplied Amery with the intellectual and psychological range required to seriously assess the narratives he had previously been exposed to.

Amery's reference of "the haze of propaganda" acknowledges the prevalent and typically obscuring nature of wartime propaganda used by countries to rally support and justify their actions. Propaganda, characterized by its mentally charged and one-sided nature, can heavily influence public perception, making it difficult for individuals to discern objective realities. By describing propaganda as a "haze", Amery suggests that it clouds judgment and obscures truth.

The declaration "something which my conscience informs me is the reality" represents a deeply individual realization. It shows that through self-questioning and a broader analysis of the information offered to him, Amery reached conclusions that resonated with his inner ethical compass, separate from external impacts. This assertion of fact based on conscience highlights the internal conflict individuals might experience when facing powerful social forces with deeply individual beliefs.

Nevertheless, it's crucial to acknowledge Amery's questionable legacy as a propagandist for Nazi Germany, which casts a complex light on his assertions of fact. His perceived clarity might have been self-serving or misdirected, provided his later activities and convictions. This raises broader questions about the nature of truth, the impact of propaganda, and the personal predispositions that form our understanding of international occasions, making Amery's reflection both intriguing and controversial.