"Further, there are things of which the mind understands one part, but remains ignorant of the other; and when man is able to comprehend certain things, it does not follow that he must be able to comprehend everything"
About this Quote
Maimonides warns that the intellect grasps fragments, not the whole, and that competence in one domain never licenses a claim to universal insight. The mind can penetrate part of a matter while remaining blind to the rest; understanding is lumpy, uneven, and contingent. From this it follows that knowledge should breed humility rather than overconfidence. The point is not to denigrate reason but to map its borders, so that inquiry proceeds with care and piety rather than presumption.
The line belongs to the project of The Guide for the Perplexed, where Maimonides addresses students torn between Aristotelian philosophy and the Torah. He embraces rigorous reasoning, yet insists that certain questions resist human comprehension. Chief among these is the divine essence. We may know God by his actions, by the ordered patterns in nature and law, but not by grasping what God is in himself. This is the logic of negative theology: we know more securely what cannot be said than what can. The passage thus anchors a method for navigating metaphysics without slipping into idolatry of the intellect, the temptation to make our ideas into gods.
He also draws a practical epistemology. Demonstration can yield certainty in mathematics or physics, while metaphysical claims are harder to secure; moral reasoning requires prudence and experience; prophecy entails a perfected intellect and imagination that most will not attain. Each field has its standards and its thresholds of clarity. To move from success in one area to a belief that everything is knowable in the same way is to confuse the varied textures of reality.
The insight remains contemporary. Scientific models illuminate phenomena while leaving other aspects obscure; expertise is specialized; language strains at ultimate things. A wise mind celebrates what it can truly know, marks what it cannot, and keeps both devotion and argument within those bounds.
The line belongs to the project of The Guide for the Perplexed, where Maimonides addresses students torn between Aristotelian philosophy and the Torah. He embraces rigorous reasoning, yet insists that certain questions resist human comprehension. Chief among these is the divine essence. We may know God by his actions, by the ordered patterns in nature and law, but not by grasping what God is in himself. This is the logic of negative theology: we know more securely what cannot be said than what can. The passage thus anchors a method for navigating metaphysics without slipping into idolatry of the intellect, the temptation to make our ideas into gods.
He also draws a practical epistemology. Demonstration can yield certainty in mathematics or physics, while metaphysical claims are harder to secure; moral reasoning requires prudence and experience; prophecy entails a perfected intellect and imagination that most will not attain. Each field has its standards and its thresholds of clarity. To move from success in one area to a belief that everything is knowable in the same way is to confuse the varied textures of reality.
The insight remains contemporary. Scientific models illuminate phenomena while leaving other aspects obscure; expertise is specialized; language strains at ultimate things. A wise mind celebrates what it can truly know, marks what it cannot, and keeps both devotion and argument within those bounds.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Maimonides
Add to List










