"Gandhi has asked that the British Government should walk out of India and leave the Indian people to settle differences among themselves, even if it means chaos and confusion"

The quote by Stafford Cripps records a turning point in the Indian independence movement. In this statement, Cripps is referencing Mahatma Gandhi's call for the British colonial federal government to withdraw from India, thus permitting Indians to determine their own future. This need is an elemental aspect of the more comprehensive Quit India Movement that Gandhi championed in the early 1940s.

Gandhi's request for the British to "go out" of India highlights his belief in self-determination and non-violence. Despite the prospective consequences, such as "turmoil and confusion", Gandhi was resolute that India must gain the autonomy to browse its own problems, even at the risk of initial instability. This indicates a deep trust in the Indian populace's ability to handle their affairs, directed by a distinct vision of a free and united India, free from external rule.

Stafford Cripps was a British politician who led the Cripps Mission in 1942, an effort by the British government to secure India's complete cooperation in World War II. The objective proposed a type of dominion status for India after the war, which was ultimately rejected by Indian leaders, consisting of Gandhi, due to its inadequacies and delays in approving full independence.

The acknowledgment of possible "turmoil and confusion" shows a typical British perspective at the time, one of apprehension about India's capability to self-govern without coming down into condition. However, Gandhi's persistence that such obstacles could and must be managed internally stresses his philosophy that real freedom and unity should be organically cultivated rather than enforced externally.

This declaration highlights the tension in between colonial powers and nationalist movements: a clash between preserving control and the unavoidable drive towards self-governance. Gandhi's position that liberty was worthwhile, even at the expense of preliminary disorder, stays a powerful testimony to his long-lasting faith in non-violence and democratic self-governance as fundamental concepts for a complimentary India.