"Hence poetry is something more philosophic and of graver import than history, since its statements are rather of the nature of universals, whereas those of history are singulars"
About this Quote
Aristotle is doing something sly here: he’s not flattering poets so much as demoting the status of mere chronicle. By ranking poetry above history, he flips the common-sense hierarchy (facts first, stories second) and replaces it with a philosophical one: patterns first, particulars second. The line lands because it’s an argument about knowledge disguised as a comment on art.
The key move is his distinction between universals and singulars. History, for Aristotle, is trapped in the “what happened”: Alcibiades did this, Athens did that. Useful, sometimes thrilling, but epistemically narrow. Poetry, even when invented, aims at the “what tends to happen” - the recurring logic of ambition, jealousy, hubris, reversal. That’s why it’s “of graver import”: it doesn’t just preserve events; it models human behavior. He’s defending mimesis (imitation) against Plato’s charge that art is a second-rate copy of reality. Aristotle replies: the imitation can be truer than the record, because it distills reality into intelligible form.
The context is the Poetics, written in a culture where epic and tragedy weren’t niche entertainments; they were civic technology, teaching audiences how to feel about power, fate, and responsibility. The subtext is methodological: Aristotle is telling his readers what kind of truth matters for ethics and politics. Not the courtroom truth of evidence, but the explanatory truth of causes, probabilities, and types. In an age obsessed with data points, he’s reminding us why narrative isn’t the enemy of truth - it’s one of its sharpest tools.
The key move is his distinction between universals and singulars. History, for Aristotle, is trapped in the “what happened”: Alcibiades did this, Athens did that. Useful, sometimes thrilling, but epistemically narrow. Poetry, even when invented, aims at the “what tends to happen” - the recurring logic of ambition, jealousy, hubris, reversal. That’s why it’s “of graver import”: it doesn’t just preserve events; it models human behavior. He’s defending mimesis (imitation) against Plato’s charge that art is a second-rate copy of reality. Aristotle replies: the imitation can be truer than the record, because it distills reality into intelligible form.
The context is the Poetics, written in a culture where epic and tragedy weren’t niche entertainments; they were civic technology, teaching audiences how to feel about power, fate, and responsibility. The subtext is methodological: Aristotle is telling his readers what kind of truth matters for ethics and politics. Not the courtroom truth of evidence, but the explanatory truth of causes, probabilities, and types. In an age obsessed with data points, he’s reminding us why narrative isn’t the enemy of truth - it’s one of its sharpest tools.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Aristotle, Poetics (Bekker 1451b). Passage commonly translated: "Poetry is more philosophic and of graver import than history, since its statements are rather of the nature of universals..." |
More Quotes by Aristotle
Add to List
