"I am a free lover. I have an inalienable, constitutional and natural right to love whom I may, to love as long or short a period as I can; to change that love every day if I please"

Victoria Woodhull's declaration on free love articulates an extreme and progressive vision of individual liberty, especially in the context of the 19th century. By asserting herself as a "totally free fan", Woodhull challenges the standard norms and societal constraints of her time regarding love and marital relationship. Her statement stresses autonomy over one's romantic and emotional life, proposing that people have the fundamental right to choose who they like, how they like, and for what duration they want to keep that love.

Woodhull's usage of the terms "inalienable, constitutional and natural right" evokes both political and philosophical dimensions. "Inalienable rights" alludes to the basic freedoms that are ensured to every person, similar to the language discovered in the United States Declaration of Independence. By including "constitutional", she recommends that such flexibilities ought to be recognized within the legal frameworks that govern society. Finally, by referencing "natural right", she aligns with the Enlightenment idea that such liberties are intrinsic to human nature and ought to be appreciated universally.

The notion of altering love as typically as wanted directly challenges the institution of marriage as a long-lasting bond. In the 19th century, marital relationship was predominantly viewed as a permanent social contract, typically based upon necessity or obligation instead of individual choice or love. Woodhull's statement suggests that love should not be bound by such constraints and that individual joy and fulfillment need to take precedence over social expectations.

Ultimately, Woodhull's quote can be seen as a manifesto for individual liberty and credibility in human relationships. It calls for the approval of dynamic and evolving expressions of love, showing an understanding that enjoy, similar to people themselves, can alter and grow. Such concepts were ahead of their time, laying a structure for future discussions around individual rights, gender equality, and the nature of relationships.