"I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy"
About this Quote
Feynman’s line punctures a comforting modern myth: that scientific brilliance is a transferable passport to wisdom everywhere else. He’s not doing false humility so much as refusing the cultural coronation that turns Nobel-caliber competence into all-purpose authority. The provocation is blunt on purpose. By calling the scientist “just as dumb as the next guy,” he yanks the lab coat off the pedestal and drops it into the messy crowd where politics, morality, art, and social judgment live.
The intent is partly defensive: protect science from being dragged into arenas where its tools don’t apply. Feynman understood how easily “science” gets used as a rhetorical weapon - a prestige brand to sell opinions, policies, even personal philosophies. His subtext is about domain limits. Scientific training sharpens certain habits: skepticism, quantification, model-building, experimental discipline. But nonscientific problems often hinge on values, power, interpretation, and human incentives - variables you can’t isolate in a clean apparatus. The scientist who forgets that isn’t more enlightened; he’s merely confident.
Context matters. Postwar America elevated scientists to near-priestly status, especially as physics became synonymous with national survival (and threat) in the atomic age. Feynman, who worked at Los Alamos and later became famous for skewering bureaucratic complacency on the Challenger commission, had seen how expertise can both illuminate and mislead. The quote is a warning against technocratic cosplay: don’t confuse a method for a worldview. It’s also a jab at the public’s hunger for geniuses to tell them what to think - a hunger Feynman treats as the real foolishness on trial.
The intent is partly defensive: protect science from being dragged into arenas where its tools don’t apply. Feynman understood how easily “science” gets used as a rhetorical weapon - a prestige brand to sell opinions, policies, even personal philosophies. His subtext is about domain limits. Scientific training sharpens certain habits: skepticism, quantification, model-building, experimental discipline. But nonscientific problems often hinge on values, power, interpretation, and human incentives - variables you can’t isolate in a clean apparatus. The scientist who forgets that isn’t more enlightened; he’s merely confident.
Context matters. Postwar America elevated scientists to near-priestly status, especially as physics became synonymous with national survival (and threat) in the atomic age. Feynman, who worked at Los Alamos and later became famous for skewering bureaucratic complacency on the Challenger commission, had seen how expertise can both illuminate and mislead. The quote is a warning against technocratic cosplay: don’t confuse a method for a worldview. It’s also a jab at the public’s hunger for geniuses to tell them what to think - a hunger Feynman treats as the real foolishness on trial.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List


