"I believe that, as long as there is plenty, poverty is evil"
About this Quote
So long as abundance exists, poverty stops being a sad accident and becomes a political indictment. Robert Kennedy’s line works because it flips the moral script: he isn’t asking for pity; he’s assigning blame. The key phrase is “as long as there is plenty,” a quiet qualifier that turns a timeless condition into a solvable scandal. Poverty, in this framing, isn’t destiny or personal failure. It’s evidence of a society choosing misallocation over justice.
RFK’s intent is both ethical and tactical. Ethically, he’s rejecting the comforting American story that hardship is simply the price of freedom or the natural byproduct of ambition. Tactically, he’s cornering opponents who prefer charity to policy: if “plenty” exists, then voluntary generosity isn’t an adequate response. Structural problems demand structural remedies.
The subtext also carries a sharp rebuttal to the era’s favorite evasions. In the 1960s, amid the War on Poverty, civil rights battles, and visible affluence on television, the country was watching itself become richer while many remained excluded from that prosperity. RFK visited impoverished communities in Appalachia and urban neighborhoods; those trips gave this moral claim a documentary edge. He’s not romanticizing “the poor” or celebrating resilience. He’s arguing that poverty in a wealthy nation is a choice made through budgets, labor rules, housing policy, and racial hierarchy.
Calling poverty “evil” raises the stakes: not unfortunate, not inefficient, not regrettable. Evil. That’s rhetoric meant to force urgency and, just as importantly, accountability.
RFK’s intent is both ethical and tactical. Ethically, he’s rejecting the comforting American story that hardship is simply the price of freedom or the natural byproduct of ambition. Tactically, he’s cornering opponents who prefer charity to policy: if “plenty” exists, then voluntary generosity isn’t an adequate response. Structural problems demand structural remedies.
The subtext also carries a sharp rebuttal to the era’s favorite evasions. In the 1960s, amid the War on Poverty, civil rights battles, and visible affluence on television, the country was watching itself become richer while many remained excluded from that prosperity. RFK visited impoverished communities in Appalachia and urban neighborhoods; those trips gave this moral claim a documentary edge. He’s not romanticizing “the poor” or celebrating resilience. He’s arguing that poverty in a wealthy nation is a choice made through budgets, labor rules, housing policy, and racial hierarchy.
Calling poverty “evil” raises the stakes: not unfortunate, not inefficient, not regrettable. Evil. That’s rhetoric meant to force urgency and, just as importantly, accountability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List







