"I cannot say whether things will get better if we change; what I can say is they must change if they are to get better"
About this Quote
The line balances skepticism with resolve. It refuses the easy promise that any reform will automatically bring improvement, yet insists that improvement cannot arrive without the willingness to alter course. The logic is simple and sharp: not all change is progress, but every instance of progress is a form of change. That recognition cuts through both naive optimism and paralyzing conservatism, and it sets a demanding standard for action: accept uncertainty, and act anyway.
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, an 18th-century German physicist, satirist, and aphorist, earned his reputation by puncturing certainty. Living in the Enlightenment, he delighted in exposing illusions while upholding the value of observation and experiment. His notebooks, the Waste Books, capture a mind attuned to nuance and wary of grand claims. The refusal to predict whether change will improve things reflects a scientist’s modesty about outcomes; the insistence that improvement requires change reflects a scientist’s method. In the laboratory, you learn by altering variables and observing results. In life and politics, the same principle holds: standing still yields the same results you already have.
The line also reveals a moral stance against status quo bias. Fear of unintended consequences often masquerades as prudence, but it can become an excuse for stagnation. Lichtenberg offers a bracing alternative: judge proposals not by their promise of certainty, which is unavailable, but by whether they are disciplined attempts to move conditions toward better ends, with feedback and correction along the way. That is not a plea for change for its own sake; it is a call for iterative, evidence-based adaptation.
The lesson travels well across domains. Personal growth, institutional reform, scientific discovery, democratic renewal: each requires the courage to disturb settled arrangements, with humility about results and vigilance in evaluating them. Improvement is a destination reached by successive departures. The risk of change is real, but the risk of refusing it is certainty: more of exactly what already is.
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, an 18th-century German physicist, satirist, and aphorist, earned his reputation by puncturing certainty. Living in the Enlightenment, he delighted in exposing illusions while upholding the value of observation and experiment. His notebooks, the Waste Books, capture a mind attuned to nuance and wary of grand claims. The refusal to predict whether change will improve things reflects a scientist’s modesty about outcomes; the insistence that improvement requires change reflects a scientist’s method. In the laboratory, you learn by altering variables and observing results. In life and politics, the same principle holds: standing still yields the same results you already have.
The line also reveals a moral stance against status quo bias. Fear of unintended consequences often masquerades as prudence, but it can become an excuse for stagnation. Lichtenberg offers a bracing alternative: judge proposals not by their promise of certainty, which is unavailable, but by whether they are disciplined attempts to move conditions toward better ends, with feedback and correction along the way. That is not a plea for change for its own sake; it is a call for iterative, evidence-based adaptation.
The lesson travels well across domains. Personal growth, institutional reform, scientific discovery, democratic renewal: each requires the courage to disturb settled arrangements, with humility about results and vigilance in evaluating them. Improvement is a destination reached by successive departures. The risk of change is real, but the risk of refusing it is certainty: more of exactly what already is.
Quote Details
| Topic | Embrace Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Georg
Add to List
