"I can't get my head around the fact that the technology of the first two movies, which are forty years prior to Star Wars, is so much better than any technology they had in Star Wars!"

David Prowse, understood for his role as Darth Vader in the original Star Wars trilogy, is expressing a typical belief shared by lots of fans of the franchise, which associates with the viewed technological discrepancy between the prequel trilogy and the original trilogy. The quote highlights an interesting paradox in the Star Wars saga, where the prequels, set earlier in the timeline, display advanced innovation than what is seen in the original movies.

This viewed inconsistency stems from the real-world development of filmmaking technology and special effects. The original Star Wars trilogy, released in between 1977 and 1983, had limited resources and innovation available to filmmakers at the time. George Lucas and his group at Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) originated many innovative techniques for producing the remarkable visual effects seen in these films. In spite of these achievements, the innovation still had its constraints, leading to a less sleek look compared to what contemporary audiences are accustomed to.

In contrast, the prequel trilogy, released in between 1999 and 2005, benefited from substantial advances in computer-generated imagery (CGI) and digital filmmaking. With these technological improvements, Lucas had the ability to illustrate more detailed spacecraft, extensive cityscapes, and dynamic environments, which naturally appeared more advanced than those in the original trilogy.

Prowse's remark highlights a broader difficulty in prequels across various media: keeping consistency within an imaginary universe while leveraging improved real-world innovation. This obstacle typically causes discussions amongst fans about continuity and narrative coherence. It also shows the problem of balancing imaginative storytelling with technological advancements, a typical problem in long-running franchises.

Ultimately, Prowse's observation invites reflection on how innovation forms our understanding of fictional worlds and the importance of keeping narrative consistency despite technological improvements. It likewise motivates audiences to appreciate the initial trilogy's groundbreaking achievements, which led the way for the visual spectacles seen in the prequels.