"I distinguish, between nationalism and patriotism"

Michael Ignatieff's statement, "I distinguish, between nationalism and patriotism", encapsulates a nuanced expedition of 2 typically conflated principles. At its core, this difference highlights different relational and psychological ties individuals hold towards their nations.

Patriotism, as Ignatieff might suggest, is the affectionate, inclusive, and important belief people feel towards their homeland. It is identified by a deep love for one's country and a dedication to its improvement, rooted in shared worths, concepts, and a collective identity. Patriots are driven by a positive desire to see their nation measure up to its perfects; they commemorate accomplishments however do not shy away from acknowledging and addressing its defects. This form of loyalty encourages discussion, growth, and unity within diversity, as it is less about blind obligation and more about contributing favorably to society.

In contrast, nationalism is typically depicted as a more exclusionary and aggressive ideology, where loyalty to one's nation takes precedence over everything else. Ignatieff's distinction likely reviews nationalism's tendency to prioritize national superiority and homogeneity, sometimes to the hinderance of other countries or minority groups within the country. This type of obligation can manifest in antagonism towards viewed outside hazards or internal dissent, resulting in jingoism or xenophobia. Nationalism can often transform the love of one's country into a zero-sum video game, where the nation's successes are viewed relatively versus others, fostering competition instead of collaboration.

Therefore, Ignatieff's distinction prompts caution and self-questioning. It calls for an understanding that while both patriotism and nationalism originate from a love of one's nation, they diverge profoundly in practice and implication. The former welcomes vital engagement and inclusivity as a course to real nationwide strength and identity, while the latter may cultivate department and uncritical conformity under the guise of unity. By separating the 2, Ignatieff motivates a discourse on how love for one's country can be revealed in manner ins which promote real development, regard, and worldwide cooperation.