"I do believe that reading can help you understand what you're writing and see what others are doing. But sometimes the desire for more information can act as an inhibitor"

Manuel Puig's quote on reading and composing exposes a double nature of details acquisition, emphasizing both its helpful and potentially destructive impacts on imagination. On one hand, Puig acknowledges the positive impact reading has on writing. By engaging with diverse texts, authors can improve their understanding of narrative structures, stylistic nuances, and thematic explorations. Reading expands one's literary horizons, using insights into the methods employed by other writers, which can then fine-tune and inform one's own work. This is a view commonly held across the literary community, as it highlights continuous knowing as a crucial chauffeur of writing refinement.

However, Puig warns of the other side, where the hunger for info ends up being detrimental, acting as an "inhibitor". This suggests that an overconsumption of external stimuli can suppress originality and creative spontaneity. Writers might end up being so entrenched in the pursuit of information that it overwhelms their capability to produce original ideas. In essence, when authors are constantly comparing themselves to others or trying to replicate existing styles, they may lose sight of their authentic voice, resulting in acquired instead of original works.

Furthermore, this dependence on external validation through information can lead to innovative paralysis. Over-researching might produce a psychological clutter, causing choice tiredness where a writer is slowed down by the large volume of possibilities and details. Instead of helping with creativity, it becomes a barrier, preventing the development of thought and development of an unique narrative style.

Ultimately, Puig's insight requires a balanced method to reading and writing. Writers should look for understanding to enrich their craft but needs to remain watchful not to let this mission eclipse their creative impulses and individuality. This balance allows authors to draw motivation from existing works while cultivating an initial voice that resonates with authenticity.