"I do think that our freedoms are at risk"
About this Quote
A Supreme Court justice saying “our freedoms are at risk” isn’t a poetic flourish; it’s a warning shot. Coming from Clarence Thomas, the line reads less like a politician’s stump-speech anxiety and more like a jurisprudential thesis distilled to its most combustible form: the idea that American liberty is being slowly redefined by institutions that are not accountable in the way elections are. The vagueness is the point. “Our freedoms” invites listeners across the ideological spectrum to pour in their own fears, while keeping the speaker’s target list strategically flexible: federal agencies, courts, universities, public health bureaucracies, the administrative state.
Thomas’s long-running project has been to treat “freedom” as something rooted in a constrained constitutional text, not a living set of social expectations. So the subtext is a reversal of the usual liberal narrative. The threat isn’t private power or majoritarian backlash; it’s governmental overreach dressed up as expertise, and judicial doctrines that, in his view, smuggle policy preferences into law. When he says “at risk,” he implies urgency without admitting inevitability: a call for judges (and perhaps legislatures) to act before precedent hardens into permanent architecture.
Context matters because Thomas often voices these concerns in a broader critique of how rights are recognized and expanded. The line also carries a performative edge: a justice describing risk is simultaneously shaping public permission for future rulings. It’s not just diagnosis; it’s scene-setting for a particular kind of corrective.
Thomas’s long-running project has been to treat “freedom” as something rooted in a constrained constitutional text, not a living set of social expectations. So the subtext is a reversal of the usual liberal narrative. The threat isn’t private power or majoritarian backlash; it’s governmental overreach dressed up as expertise, and judicial doctrines that, in his view, smuggle policy preferences into law. When he says “at risk,” he implies urgency without admitting inevitability: a call for judges (and perhaps legislatures) to act before precedent hardens into permanent architecture.
Context matters because Thomas often voices these concerns in a broader critique of how rights are recognized and expanded. The line also carries a performative edge: a justice describing risk is simultaneously shaping public permission for future rulings. It’s not just diagnosis; it’s scene-setting for a particular kind of corrective.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Clarence
Add to List





