"I don't feel that I have any great grasp of technique that I should pass along to people"
About this Quote
Kane's remark shrugs off the authority that stardom can confer and reveals a philosophy of craft that resists being bottled into lessons. Rather than claiming a codified method, she frames her work as idiosyncratic, intuitive, and shaped by circumstance. That stance is striking because she has long been celebrated for precision and originality, from the delicacy of Hester Street to the comic specificity of Taxi and the wild, affectionate eccentricities of The Princess Bride and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. The very qualities audiences might label technique she treats as personal tools grown organically, not a system to hand down.
There is an ethic of artistic privacy here, a feeling that performance emerges from listening, responsiveness, and the chemistry of collaborators more than from rules. Many actors publicly align with schools such as Method or Meisner; Kane suggests that useful habits may be too individual to universalize. To present them as transferable could turn living choices into dead prescriptions and encourage imitation over discovery. Her humility also reflects the strangeness of acting itself: a craft that requires control and preparation, yet depends on presence, vulnerability, and the irreducible quirks of a body and voice in a moment.
The remark can read as a protection of mystery. By refusing the mantle of guru, she keeps attention on the work rather than the myth of a formula. It also offers quiet encouragement to younger artists. If even a decorated performer does not claim a great grasp of technique, then permission is granted to build a process that fits the contours of ones own temperament, role by role. Technique still matters, but it is a toolbox assembled over time and used in conversation with a character, a scene partner, and an audience. For Kane, integrity resides less in passing down rules than in honoring that living, unrepeatable process.
There is an ethic of artistic privacy here, a feeling that performance emerges from listening, responsiveness, and the chemistry of collaborators more than from rules. Many actors publicly align with schools such as Method or Meisner; Kane suggests that useful habits may be too individual to universalize. To present them as transferable could turn living choices into dead prescriptions and encourage imitation over discovery. Her humility also reflects the strangeness of acting itself: a craft that requires control and preparation, yet depends on presence, vulnerability, and the irreducible quirks of a body and voice in a moment.
The remark can read as a protection of mystery. By refusing the mantle of guru, she keeps attention on the work rather than the myth of a formula. It also offers quiet encouragement to younger artists. If even a decorated performer does not claim a great grasp of technique, then permission is granted to build a process that fits the contours of ones own temperament, role by role. Technique still matters, but it is a toolbox assembled over time and used in conversation with a character, a scene partner, and an audience. For Kane, integrity resides less in passing down rules than in honoring that living, unrepeatable process.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Carol
Add to List






