"I don't know what 'operational control' of the border means, but I do understand the English language. And as I understand that phrase, that's not true. We do not have operational control"
About this Quote
In this quote, John Cornyn, a U.S. Senator from Texas, expresses hesitation about the principle of "functional control" regarding border security. His declaration highlights 2 key points: a lack of clearness surrounding the term "functional control" and a review of its applicability to the current situation at the border.
Firstly, Cornyn admits to not knowing exactly what "operational control" involves. This reflects a broader concern in political and governmental discourse where terms can frequently be vague, subjective, or open to interpretation. The term "operational control" may be formally defined by policies or laws, such as the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which described it as the avoidance of all illegal entries into the U.S. However, in practice, it's made complex by the multifaceted nature of border security, which includes numerous obstacles, consisting of geographical, legal, logistical, and humanitarian elements. Cornyn's admission highlights the requirement for clear, constant definitions and expectations in border policy discussions.
Second of all, Cornyn take advantage of the English language as a tool for interpretation, emphasizing his conclusion that the expression "functional control" does not precisely describe the present state of the border. His position implies that the truth on the ground does not meet whatever definition of "operational control" is being used. By stating "that's not true", Cornyn recommends that the border situation is not effectively managed or managed to the extent some may declare. This could refer to ongoing issues like unauthorized crossings, border patrol obstacles, legal and asylum processing backlogs, or humanitarian concerns.
In essence, Cornyn's declaration is a review of border management effectiveness while also calling for higher transparency and sincerity in how border security is communicated. It shows his position that the present techniques might not be sufficient and indicate a wider need for detailed and clear policy services.
About the Author