"I don't know which is more discouraging, literature or chickens"

E.B. White, best remembered for his timeless children's books “Charlotte's Web” and “Stuart Little”, had a unique perspective on mundane aspects of life. Throughout his work, he incorporated an intriguing amalgamation of seemingly unrelated elements – in this case, literature and chickens. Immersed in the world of writing while simultaneously living on a farm, White’s life was marked by a contrasting yet harmonious coexistence of elements, something reflected in this profound quote.

Analyzing this aphorism, we first need to recognize the common factor between literature and chickens - their inherent unpredictability. Just like literature can bewilder with its unpredictability and myriad interpretations, rearing chickens - with their capricious behavior and unpredictable outcomes - can similarly confound. Hence, the discouragement White speaks of could potentially evolve from this shared unpredictability.

Literature, in all its forms, often poses questions that might not have definite or objective answers. The process of creating literature - writing – can sometimes frustrate and bewilder with its tendency to bloom unforeseen dilemmas. Similarly, the process of interpreting literature, reading, could equally baffle with its plethora of nuanced readings, interpretations, and inherent subjectivity. On the other hand, chickens exhibit a paradox of simplicity and complexity, just like literature. They might seem simple and straightforward creatures; however, their behaviors, preferences, and idiosyncrasies can significantly differ, creating a web of biological unpredictability.

Next on the list of common traits, literature and chickens both require patience, perseverance, and even resilience to see results. A literary work might not always find immediate acceptance, just like an egg doesn’t hatch instantly, establishing the trials and tribulations inherent in both.

The discouragement White touches upon embodies the disillusionment and exasperation that can stem from constant unpredictability and the arduous journey towards seeing results. Yet, there is a charisma in both literature and chickens that attracts and engages, despite the discouragement they might catalyze. It is perhaps the intrigue and fascination of potential discoveries and outcomes that keeps the writer writing, just like a farmer patiently tends to his flock of chickens.

So, White's comparison subtly frames two aspects of his life and work that were central to his existence while highlighting a thread of shared complexity, unpredictability, and the essence of perseverance in both.