"I don't like just traveling in for a short time. I've done that before, because sometimes you work for magazines and they have a budget, and if you're working for them, they want something by a certain time"

In this quote from Joe Sacco, we delve into the complexities of balancing professional obligations with individual choices, particularly in the context of travel and journalism. Sacco reveals a clear preference against brief, rushed journeys, recommending a desire for more significant and immersive experiences when taking a trip. This perspective sheds light on the tension that typically exists between the restraints set by external expectations, such as those of companies or publication platforms, and the individual aspirations of a private seeking a deeper connection to the places they go to.

Sacco's reference of working for magazines highlights the economic and logistical realities that typically dictate the nature of travel for reporters and professional photographers. Publications usually run within strict financial constraints and tight due dates, which means that factors should typically adhere to expedited travel schedules that focus on efficient material production over leisurely or extensive exploration. This can result in a situation where the depth of understanding or the richness of the narrative is jeopardized in favor of conference time-sensitive requirements.

The phrase "I've done that previously" indicates Sacco's recognition and acceptance of these circumstances as part of his expert experience. There is an implicit understanding of the requirement of such plans in the world of magazine publication, where providing content quickly can typically take precedence over other considerations. However, Sacco's declaration likewise suggests a specific level of discontentment or disappointment with this method, as it probably undermines the authenticity and profundity of the stories that can be recorded.

Eventually, this quote underscores a wider commentary on the crafts of journalism and storytelling. It encapsulates the predicament dealt with by many creatives who should navigate the pressures of business needs while making every effort to maintain the integrity and depth of their work. Sacco's viewpoint welcomes reflection on the value of putting in the time to genuinely engage with a place and its individuals, a venture that might be impeded by the stiff structures typically enforced by professional restraints.