"I don't think that the Pulitzer should be given the way it is. I think the competition should be anonymous. I think completely different people would win it if the names were taken off because a lot of it is done on relationships and names"

In this quote, prominent composer John Corigliano critiques the choice procedure for the Pulitzer Prize, suggesting that the current method of awarding is heavily affected by individual relationships and recognition of names instead of the benefit of the work itself. Corigliano's declaration points towards a wider issue about the neutrality and impartiality of prominent awards. He argues for a confidential examination procedure, where judges evaluate the work without knowing the identity of the creator. This approach, he believes, would offer a more equal opportunity and cause more diverse and possibly unforeseen winners.

The concept of confidential evaluating is not new, and it is used in numerous competitors, especially in fields where subjective taste plays a considerable role. For example, in some music and art competitors, entries are presented without any identifiers to enable judges to focus purely on the quality of the work. By promoting for a similar method, Corigliano underscores his belief that creativity and achievement ought to be determined by the intrinsic quality of the work instead of the reputation or connections of the artist.

His criticism likewise highlights an underlying apprehension about the impact of individual networks and the possible predisposition towards developed figures in the arts and literature. The notion that awards and recognitions can become unique clubs-- benefiting a choose few who are well-connected-- is a considerable concern for lots of who seek fairness in acknowledging and rewarding talent.

This point of view welcomes a larger discussion about how cultural rewards and acknowledgments are administered. It challenges companies to reflect on their choice procedures and consider reforms that might lead to a more inclusive and merit-based system. While Corigliano's recommendation might not be easily implemented, it serves as a timely for introspection and conversation about how to finest honor excellence throughout imaginative fields.