"I have done everything I can to make sure my daughter knows her father because you form your own identity by rebelling against your parents - but first you have to know them"
About this Quote
Greta Scacchi connects parental presence to the paradox of autonomy: children become themselves by pushing away, yet they can only push away from what they know. She casts rebellion not as defiance for its own sake but as a developmental tool for carving out a separate self. A parent provides the contours, habits, values, and even the quirks a young person tests, resists, and revises. Without that concrete relationship, individuation risks being built against a fantasy, which can harden into confusion, idealization, or resentment rather than a grounded identity.
The phrase you form your own identity by rebelling against your parents recognizes a familiar rhythm of adolescence, but her emphasis falls on the predicate first you have to know them. Knowing, here, means more than a name or a myth. It means the rhythms of a voice, the reality of flaws, the daily evidence that a parent is human. Only then can resistance be specific and honest. A young person can say, I do not want that, because they have actually seen that. Otherwise, the self is defined against absence, and absence is impossible to map.
Scacchi speaks from a life of international work and unconventional family arrangements, and her choice to facilitate her daughters relationship with her father reads as a deliberate refusal of parental gatekeeping. She imagines autonomy as a relational achievement: the stronger the tether to real people, the cleaner the eventual separation. That stance is both generous and pragmatic. It gives a child a fuller origin story and spares them the psychic labor of filling gaps with suspicion or fantasy.
The larger insight is that rebellion needs recognition. Boundaries and bonds are not the enemies of independence; they are its precondition. When a child truly knows where they come from, their departure becomes an articulation of self rather than an escape from a void, and maturity looks less like rejection and more like differentiation.
The phrase you form your own identity by rebelling against your parents recognizes a familiar rhythm of adolescence, but her emphasis falls on the predicate first you have to know them. Knowing, here, means more than a name or a myth. It means the rhythms of a voice, the reality of flaws, the daily evidence that a parent is human. Only then can resistance be specific and honest. A young person can say, I do not want that, because they have actually seen that. Otherwise, the self is defined against absence, and absence is impossible to map.
Scacchi speaks from a life of international work and unconventional family arrangements, and her choice to facilitate her daughters relationship with her father reads as a deliberate refusal of parental gatekeeping. She imagines autonomy as a relational achievement: the stronger the tether to real people, the cleaner the eventual separation. That stance is both generous and pragmatic. It gives a child a fuller origin story and spares them the psychic labor of filling gaps with suspicion or fantasy.
The larger insight is that rebellion needs recognition. Boundaries and bonds are not the enemies of independence; they are its precondition. When a child truly knows where they come from, their departure becomes an articulation of self rather than an escape from a void, and maturity looks less like rejection and more like differentiation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Daughter |
|---|
More Quotes by Greta
Add to List





