"I have nothing against diamonds, or rubies or emeralds or sapphires. I do object when their acquisition is complicit in the debasement of children or the destruction of a country"
About this Quote
Zwick frames luxury as morally neutral, then snaps the trap shut: the gems themselves aren’t the problem, the blood-soaked supply chain is. It’s a classic rhetorical pivot - “I have nothing against...” as disarming preface, followed by a hard ethical line that turns consumer pleasure into complicity. By listing diamonds alongside rubies, emeralds, and sapphires, he widens the indictment beyond one infamous commodity. This isn’t just about “blood diamonds”; it’s about the entire romantic mythology of precious stones colliding with the realities of extraction.
The word choice does the heavy lifting. “Acquisition” sounds clinical, almost corporate, which makes the next clause hit harder: “debasement of children” and “destruction of a country” are not side effects, they’re catastrophic outcomes. “Complicit” is the key term - it refuses the comforting story that harm happens somewhere else, to other people, for reasons unrelated to the buyer’s ring or necklace. Zwick isn’t accusing individuals of sadism; he’s accusing systems of laundering violence into glamour, and consumers of benefiting from that laundering.
The context is Zwick’s career-long interest in moral compromise under pressure (and, most pointedly, his association with stories about conflict resources). As a director, he’s speaking from a place where spectacle and conscience constantly wrestle. The quote reads like a defense of desire that still demands accountability: want the beautiful thing, sure - just don’t let beauty be purchased with ruined lives.
The word choice does the heavy lifting. “Acquisition” sounds clinical, almost corporate, which makes the next clause hit harder: “debasement of children” and “destruction of a country” are not side effects, they’re catastrophic outcomes. “Complicit” is the key term - it refuses the comforting story that harm happens somewhere else, to other people, for reasons unrelated to the buyer’s ring or necklace. Zwick isn’t accusing individuals of sadism; he’s accusing systems of laundering violence into glamour, and consumers of benefiting from that laundering.
The context is Zwick’s career-long interest in moral compromise under pressure (and, most pointedly, his association with stories about conflict resources). As a director, he’s speaking from a place where spectacle and conscience constantly wrestle. The quote reads like a defense of desire that still demands accountability: want the beautiful thing, sure - just don’t let beauty be purchased with ruined lives.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Edward
Add to List
