"I just don't think you pass on a great quarterback if you have the opportunity. If need be, you can trade it away"
About this Quote
Tony Dungy underscores a core truth of roster building: quarterback is the league’s rarest, most leverageable asset. When a truly special passer is available, the potential upside to a franchise dwarfs almost any other need or positional priority. A great quarterback stabilizes systems, elevates mediocre supporting casts, and extends competitive windows. Passing on that kind of opportunity often reflects short-term thinking: patching holes rather than addressing the foundation.
The second line highlights optionality. Draft capital and players are assets; the most liquid, most valuable asset in football is a quarterback with high ceiling. If organizational timing, scheme fit, or roster context isn’t perfect, the market still rewards control over an elite quarterback prospect. You retain the ability to trade the pick beforehand or the player afterward, often at a premium. Optionality reduces downside risk while preserving upside, making the choice asymmetric in your favor.
History supports the philosophy. Teams that secured long-term excellence at quarterback, whether by staying patient on draft night, moving up aggressively, or taking a passer despite an incumbent, reaped outsized returns. Consider Green Bay’s decision to draft Aaron Rodgers while Brett Favre was still effective, or Kansas City identifying Patrick Mahomes and reorienting their timeline. Even when the fit is imperfect, the asset rarely loses all value immediately; quarterbacks maintain a robust trade market relative to other positions.
The approach also aligns with cap strategy. A great quarterback on a rookie deal creates a cost-efficient window to build depth elsewhere. Conversely, if you already have a franchise passer and the prospect doesn’t clearly project as great, that’s when trading the pick maximizes value. The key is conviction: reserve this posture for prospects you genuinely grade as special. Overreaching on a merely good quarterback can be costly; betting on greatness, with an exit ramp through the trade market, is sound team-building logic.
The second line highlights optionality. Draft capital and players are assets; the most liquid, most valuable asset in football is a quarterback with high ceiling. If organizational timing, scheme fit, or roster context isn’t perfect, the market still rewards control over an elite quarterback prospect. You retain the ability to trade the pick beforehand or the player afterward, often at a premium. Optionality reduces downside risk while preserving upside, making the choice asymmetric in your favor.
History supports the philosophy. Teams that secured long-term excellence at quarterback, whether by staying patient on draft night, moving up aggressively, or taking a passer despite an incumbent, reaped outsized returns. Consider Green Bay’s decision to draft Aaron Rodgers while Brett Favre was still effective, or Kansas City identifying Patrick Mahomes and reorienting their timeline. Even when the fit is imperfect, the asset rarely loses all value immediately; quarterbacks maintain a robust trade market relative to other positions.
The approach also aligns with cap strategy. A great quarterback on a rookie deal creates a cost-efficient window to build depth elsewhere. Conversely, if you already have a franchise passer and the prospect doesn’t clearly project as great, that’s when trading the pick maximizes value. The key is conviction: reserve this posture for prospects you genuinely grade as special. Overreaching on a merely good quarterback can be costly; betting on greatness, with an exit ramp through the trade market, is sound team-building logic.
Quote Details
| Topic | Coaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Tony
Add to List
